Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PalominoGuy

PalominoGuy wrote: “....what idiocy! it was NOT a vaccine, that’s why they had to change the definition to get the sheep to keep lining up! Only a moron would subject a child to the monsterous vaccine schedule of the evil gov’munt out there today... ymmv”

The definition of vaccine was changed to more accurately describe the purpose of a vaccine. The old definition did not address the fact that all vaccines have breakthrough cases. No vaccine is 100% effective and the new definition reflects that fact.

Anti-vacciners choose misrepresent the childhood vaccine schedule. It is nowhere near the monstrosity some claim. In fact, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), representing 70,000 pediatricians, continues to recommend the original 2025 schedule (covering 18 diseases). They argue the federal changes are “dangerous and unnecessary”.

YMMV.


52 posted on 04/27/2026 8:21:56 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: DugwayDuke

LOL, right and the fact it was timed so perfectly to support covid clot shots and also provide “credibility” to calling it a vaccine should just be ignored, nothing to see here..

HAHAHAH what a dupe.


58 posted on 04/27/2026 11:48:53 AM PDT by Skwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson