Professor David Clements, once a Never Trumper, highlights four key reasons he will Not turn on President Trump right now

X.com ^ | April 6, 2026 | MJTruthUltra @MJTruthUltra

[ransomnote]

MJTruthUltra
@MJTruthUltra
·
14h
Professor David Clements, once a Never Trumper, highlights four key reasons he will Not turn on President Trump right now

1. If Trump was bad, evil would not try to kill him

2. If Trump did not threaten the old order, the bot press would not lie about him every hour of every day

3. A man cannot be the servant of evil if his mere being has woken more people to the face of evil than any other thing in our time

4. No man can play the deep game, and at the same time be led around by the nose like a fool

Number 3 is spot on…

His full Substack
https://professordavidclements.substack.com/p/death-resurrection-and-the-arena

April 6, 2026

---

TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: davidclements; davidkclements

[Miami Rebel]

I never heard of the fellow, but the list of ferocious MAGA (and MAGA adjacent) types who are turning on him grows longer every day.

Tucker Carlson (who was held in high esteem around these parts till recently,) Alex Jones, Joe Rogan, Matt Walsh. Unlike the professor, each of these has millions of followers.

[alternatives?]

There is no alternative.

[Alberta's Child]

Tucker Carlson (who was held in high esteem around these parts till recently,) Alex Jones, Joe Rogan, Matt Walsh. Unlike the professor, each of these has millions of followers.

And each of them has their own reason to feel a sense of betrayal over the U.S. military action against Iran.

Frankly, it has stood out as a total capitulation by Trump on the one thing -- his well-documented public screeds against stupid military campaigns in the Middle East -- that distinguished Trump from the bucket full of @ssholes who were the standard-bearers for the Republican Party before he came along.

[proust]

If the admin was “winning” we’d see people climbing all over each other desperately trying to ride the coattails. Instead we see people who have had more access to Trump than any of us running in the opposite direction. One person, like Tucker, can be easily dismissed, but it’s a trend.

[reasonisfaith]

I first suspected Tucker Carlson almost two decades ago.

With Alex Jones, I first started thinking he was a deep state stooge about eight years ago when he turned against our Patriots.

[jacknhoo]

Sounds like you can’t think for yourself.

[proust]

Sounds like you are unable to analyze basic trends.

[PsyCon]

Thanks for posting. I briefly saw that post earlier on X was then unable to locate it. I think “the bot press” is accurate and worth remembering.

[ChessExpert]

The threat from Iran has been greatly reduced.

The default was to allow Iran to become stronger yet. We should have acted sooner, and before that sooner, all the way back to 1979.

[Just mythoughts]

Ah, Tucker Carlson, goooood buddy with the pervert Hunter CATHOLIC Biden ... Tucker's daddy was CIA. Tucker born and bred to play down and dirty.

Just listen to the CATHOLIC scam artists feign holy holy holy, when IN FACT they are impotent without somebody else paying their way .... Ya know like Catholic Charities ... trafficking illegals on the USA taxpayer dimes... well that is actually to the tune of BILLIONS..

AND their CanDance wallows in $$$$ because that is the heart of Catholic like the parasites they are ... could NOT keep her big mouth shut ...

[Manuel OKelley]

Between DOGE being all but canceled, the Epstein debacle, and nwo this war my guess is the we’re screwed when the left carries the next 3-4 elections with ease

[PsyCon]

“And each of them has their own reason to feel a sense of betrayal over the U.S. military action against Iran.”

Maybe they are just piqued! Here’s an idea, don’t vote for him in 2028. Better yet, move to Venezuela and vote against him there.

[Alberta's Child]

I'm afraid it is going to be much worse than that.

I'm seeing it here in my own state legislative district. We have a Republican primary battle between a long-standing legislator who has done a perfectly fine job and a clown who has never run for public office and wasn't even a registered Republican until a month before he started his primary campaign.

The incumbent's campaign is based on a simple theme: "I've done a fine job representing this district since you first elected me X years ago."

The challenger's campaign is based on: "The Republican Party has spent the last ten years screwing Americans over, and I'll fix that if you throw this guy out of office."

If the challenger clown wins the primary, he will probably lose in the general election in November.

[ckilmer]

all true if the USA is in this war through the summer.

If it gets ended in the next month or so, then its a win for trump

[ckilmer]

it looks to me like the economy is gaining momentum. if this war can be finished in the not distant future and well before midterms—it will be a win for trump. if not. then not.

we are in the midst of a gamble.

[AndyJackson]

Why do I need a reason not to betray the President I voted for? I was unaware that fickleness and infidelity were positive character traits.