Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 03/11/2026 11:20:13 AM PDT by nickcarraway
Katelin Holloway and Ben Ramirez thought they had found their forever home when they purchased a spacious North Beach property for $4.75 million in 2021 — a four-story residence with five bedrooms, sweeping skyline views and room for their growing family.
Instead, the couple is now facing the possibility that the house must be carved back into four separate apartments after city officials determined the building was improperly converted from a multi-unit property years before they bought it, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.
SNIP
According to city officials and tenant advocates, the building had previously been altered from a four-unit apartment complex into a single-family residence without proper permits. That means the structure is still officially classified as a multi-unit property in municipal records — and may have to be restored to that configuration.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Title insurance policies are like any other kind of insurance policy.
The details that matter are in the fine print of the precise policy.
“I think the victims have a negligence cases against the Title Company, Appraiser (if one was used) and the Realtors involved in their purchase, assuming the buyers weren’t complete idiots and did everything alone. “
They knew. They chose to buy anyway.
It’s California.... the leftists in charge will find a way or make up a new “rule” mandating that the couple now must now turn it into an eight unit apartment building, house the illegals AND homeless, set aside one unit for a shooting den and make dinner for the whole building g every night.
I wonder if the current owner mentioned about it being multiple units to someone and that person complained to the City. How else would the City know.
Not if they’re leftists. They need to stay in the shit hole they voted for and leave the sane states alone
This sounds like the opposite of AG Letitia James who purchased a multi dwelling house but magically eliminated one of the apartments to get a better mortgage rate, reduce the property taxes and keeping it a residential building and not a commercial one.
Theresa sounds like a top-flight nitwit of the first degree. Pathetic would describe this wretch.
Probably some Chinese investor/developer wanting to buy the house to turn it back into apartments. White people don't matter in today's world.
“How else would the City know.”
Advocacy groups know. You have to understand the environment.
No Chinese conspiracy.
TITLE INSURANCE IS MANDATORY IN CALIF, IIRC
“title insurance”
Exactly. That is precisely why you get title insurance.
But, of course, that’s a lender requirement. Maybe they paid all cash and did not buy title insurance. Lots of uber-rich in California who pay all-cash for houses.
Happens in conservative areas this way as well. Stop allowing anonymous complaints.
“No” — I’m no real estate expert, but I would think title insurance would cover it. Why do you think otherwise?
Title insurance protects buyers against defects in title—things like undisclosed liens, forged deeds, unresolved ownership disputes, encumbrances (e.g., easements or judgments) that existed before the purchase but weren't discovered during the title search, or issues that make the title unmarketable. It covers losses from those title-related problems, such as having to defend against a claim to ownership or pay to remove a cloud on title.
In this San Francisco case (from the March 11, 2026 New York Post article), the issue isn't a title defect at all. The city is enforcing a zoning, permitting, and land-use violation: the building was illegally converted from a legal four-unit apartment building into a single-family residence years before the current owners bought it in 2021—without the required permits for merging units. City records still classify it as a multi-unit property, and San Francisco's strict policies against losing housing units mean the city is requiring restoration to four units if appeals fail.
This is a regulatory compliance / code enforcement matter, not a title claim.
Standard owner's title insurance policies (like ALTA forms) explicitly exclude coverage for:
Even if a title search missed something related to the unpermitted conversion, most policies wouldn't cover regulatory enforcement costs or forced renovations—these aren't "title defects" that impair ownership or marketability in the insured sense.
The owners might have other recourse:
The core problem is the unpermitted work and resulting zoning mismatch, which falls outside typical title policy coverage.
This is a classic San Francisco housing-preservation headache: illegal unit mergers are common historically, but the city cracks down when discovered, prioritizing housing stock over individual owners' expectations. The family is appealing to the Board of Supervisors for a compromise, but if it fails, they'll likely face expensive reconfiguration (potentially millions, plus moving out during work). Title insurance isn't the solution here.
Like I said, they're white, so they have no rights in Californication.
“TITLE INSURANCE IS MANDATORY IN CALIF, IIRC”
Not mandatory but required by most lenders.
And that is only for a lender’s policy which affords no protection to the buyer.
“Suing the seller for nondisclosure
Claim against the realtor/broker for misrepresentation
Claim under title insurance only if there was a specific recorded encumbrance missed”
It is on record that they knew before closing.
“Rightly”
Would it be possible to “convert” it back and then refuse to rent to anyone? Just refuse to list any availability. If they can make payments, why not? (Other than probable tax problems)
“This may be an issue for the Title Company.
Their product is unencumbered title.
That’s why they call it title insurance.”
First, you are assuming they had title insurance.
Second, you are wrongly assuming they didn’t know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.