Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin
My only objection to this proposed law is the use of the phrase "gender assigned at birth". That's a crap phrase from the loony left.

How about "sex determined at birth", or possibly "sex confirmed at birth" for babies who had their chromosomes checked in utero for some reason.

Here's the real point, for those individuals who believe they were "assigned" the wrong gender at birth. PROVE IT WITH A CHROMOSOME CHECK.

You think you're a woman even though the doctor said you were a boy and you have a penis? Fine, pony up the scratch for a chromosome test, and if it comes back "XX", we'll talk about getting you a "chopitoffame" operation.

You think you're a man even though you menstruate? Fine, same deal, if your chromosomes come back "XY", we'll talk about an "addadicktome".

And for those unfortunate souls with true chromosomal abnormalities like "XXY", they warrant special care.

But we gotta stop encouraging the crazies.

4 posted on 02/10/2026 11:07:55 PM PST by dayglored (This is the day which the LORD hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it. Psalms 118:24)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dayglored

It really is sex at conception. The baby’s sex. Period.


11 posted on 02/11/2026 2:36:02 AM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

“Sex confirmed at birth” makes sense, since sex is determined well before, with ultrasound.


18 posted on 02/11/2026 6:01:02 AM PST by telescope115 (Ad Astra, Ad Deum…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson