Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 02/09/2026 5:13:53 AM PST by CharlesOConnell
Louisiana sues California, New York governors to extradite doctors who mailed abortion pills
Louisiana AG Liz Murrill plans to take California Gov. Gavin Newsom and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul to court to compel their cooperation.
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
To the point: Why can't 3) the abortion chemical just "disappear" in the mail?
1) I critically rely on an anti-coagulant to prevent blood clots and stroke. This "Xarelto" has been arbitrarily made very expensive so that I have to get mine by mail order from Canada, a savings from $440 in the U.S. down to $260. I watch my order tracking like a hawk because, if I miss my pill just 1 day, I risk getting a blood clot in my leg, that could break off & go to my brain.
2) Ivermectin. Back to 2021, to the greatest civil crime in history, worse than slavery--at least slaves were allowed to live. Under N.Y. Gov. Andrew Cuomo, 10,000s of elderly Covid patients were denied early, effective treatment until they were at death's door, then they were put on highly toxic Remdesivir, forced onto suffocating ventilators on which they were assured of getting terminal lung infections, and had to die in the ICU alone without their families being able to see them--very effective for medical cost containment of "futile care"--"they're just going to die soon anyway", after taking up highly expensive end-of-life care. When Gov. Cuomo was recently a NYC Mayoral candidate, he said he is "sorry".
Okay, we forgive him. But in 2021 when we needed to order life-saving Ivermectin in the mail from India, we watched our critical mail order tracking, but without any legal justification, our medicine we needed to save our lives was arbitrarily confiscated and destroyed by postal inspectors. This in the country that once proclaimed "My Body, My Choice", in which medical "privacy" was sacrosanct...until it wasn't.
So now with 3) abortifacient chemicals--don't call it "medical" abortion, mothers who carry their pregnancies to term have better life & medical outcomes than do abortive mothers, as faithfully reported by the 1987-2000, academically neutral STAKES abortion data in Finland, where abortion is a non-issue.
(Don't even try to talk about ABC, the rigorously suppressed Abortion Breast Cancer connection accurately reported by Indian medical studies, caused by suddenly stopping normal pregnancy breast cell development, making them prone to becoming cancerous.)
So if our 2) Ivermectin can be stopped from being delivered to us, why can't 3) abortifacient chemicals be interrupted in the mails, without making some court case out of it? We never got to go to court to try to save our lives from Covid!
States like California, New York, New Jersey, and Illinois can be flooded with all of it.
This case is far worse. The doctor knew the abortifacient was going to be used to kill a child. If you mailed a firearm or poison to someone who previously told you they were going to use it to murder someone, you would be guilty as an accessory to murder and no state in the union would refuse to extradite you.
Gavin Newsom is attempting to redefine the laws of the state of Louisiana. Refusal to extradite a criminal with a valid warrant is harboring a fugitive. The Louisiana AG needs to charge Newsom as well.
There is a cough suppressant legal in Europe that has hope in treating Parkinson’s. I’ve been trying to get some for a long time but it can’t get shipped here. There are no chemicals in it like Sudafed to make anything nefarious- as it’s sold over the counter there. Makes no sense!
Abortion is a non-issue in Finland, everybody is pretty much okay with it. So when the Finnish national health service make a STAKES report of adverse abortion-related medical and life outcomes 1988-2000, the 2nd row (across) is "no-pregnancy" as a benchmark of 1.0; the "Birth" (mother carried to term) front row has the lowest cumulative mortality, probably because the Mom has to preserve her own life to care for the child; the 3rd row (across) "miscarriage" has, actually, lower mortality in the "medical" category, even than going to full term (front row), probably because of Finland's excellent medical care system; but other "miscarriage" outcomes are elevated above both "pregnancy" (front row) and "no pregnancy" (2nd row across, 1.0 baseline) for suicide, accident and homicide, possibly because miscarriage is, after all, traumatic, but exactly why suicide, accident and homicide should be elevated above pregnancy, is above my pay grade; but clearly, women who have abortions (last row, across) have elevated mortality in every category except "medical" (good E.R. care?); the explanation for elevated suicide, accident and homicide may have something to do with abortive mothers ("abortion doesn't make you un-pregnant, you just get a dead baby") not taking very good care of themselves.
MiliantNutCase “There is a cough suppressant legal in Europe that has hope in treating Parkinson’s. I’ve been trying to get some for a long time but it can’t get shipped here. There are no chemicals in it like Sudafed to make anything nefarious- as it’s sold over the counter there. Makes no sense!”
Ivermectin’s brother, Chloroquine, is known in Africa as “the Sunday pill”. Taken once a week against virulent tropical parasites, it’s cheap and available over the counter, one of the great medical successes. Just not in FDA Industry Captured U.S.A.
SPICY AS HECK!!! WOW!! LOVE IT!!!
T.B. Yoits “The doctor knew the abortifacient was going to be used to kill a child. If you mailed a firearm or poison to someone who previously told you they were going to use it to murder someone, you would be guilty as an accessory to murder and no state in the union would refuse to extradite you.”
TOUCHE! (The fencing term meaning, your touch is a lethal stab.)
Chloroquine is also used to treat Rheumatoid Arthritis.
The reason they are intercepting drugs from Canada is the agreement the drug companies have with the government. The pharmaceutical companies have agreed to sell an allotment of their drugs at a loss into socialist medical systems. In return they get to charge whatever they want in the American system. They are protected from generics and competition for a set time. If the pills are bought from a socialist system, then the socialist system will run out. The pharmaceutical companies will lose money by competing against themselves. The government is trying to protect those companies and their monopoly. It may sound horrible. That’s because it is.
A visit to the web site indicates it costs $399
Gen.Blather: “The reason they are intercepting drugs from Canada is the agreement the drug companies have with the government. The pharmaceutical companies have agreed to sell an allotment of their drugs at a loss into socialist medical systems. In return they get to charge whatever they want in the American system. They are protected from generics and competition for a set time. If the pills are bought from a socialist system, then the socialist system will run out. The pharmaceutical companies will lose money by competing against themselves. The government is trying to protect those companies and their monopoly. It may sound horrible. That’s because it is.”
Xarelto as an “anti-coaglulant” is a successor to Coumadin and Warfarin. I used to pay claims at Blue Shield in Woodland CA by UC Davis. When one of these anti-coagulant claims would come in, everything else was put on hold and it had to be paid STAT.
Xarelto had its fair 14 year patent. But regulatory capture worked because of the pretext that the company that makes it got an extension on the pediatric version, only, so all of it has to continue to be expensive.
My health system arbitrarily decided that I was too poor to be able to afford Xarelto, so they put me on a cheap substituted. After 2 months, I was going out biking one day and, whoah!, something was very “un-right” with my leg.
I had developed a blood clot in the lower leg called a DVT (deep vein thrombosis). The E.R. doctor immediately put me back on Xarelto.
It is what is called “Iatrogenic” illness, doctor caused, and was a case of an “adverse medical incident”.
I didn’t want to antagonize the system, which is generally very good, but if I did, as a former Morbidity and Mortality Clerk (handling internal, doctor judged adverse medical events, the only thing they fear, they laugh at lawyers), I would put it like this:
“I am concerned that my care has ‘fallen below the standard’. Please refer my case to Morbidity and Mortality Conference.”
You’ll see the blood rush out of your doctor’s face—they blanch.
This is a combo drug. I buy them separately. Expensive, but not $399 expensive.
I just checked the website:
https://www.twc.health/products/ivermectin-mebendazole
$539 for a 3 month supply. These generic drugs are sold for pennies in many countries. In many available over-the-counter. Big-time ripoff here.
The medical system in the US and big Pharma are hopelessly corrupt.
I have one of the Wellness Company's kits for $250, but, unfortunately, it's for the last "plandemic", the Covid 19 one, not for the next one, which promises to be high-infectivity/high-mortality.
An atricle How the WHO Dictated the COVID-19 Pandemic—And How It's Already Dictating the Coming Bird Flu Pandemic in the Nick Fleetwood substack discusses the possibility of the next pandemic. It has been suggested that ivermectin and chloroquine were not needed for Covid-19 prophylaxis, that simple use of Vitamin D would have been sufficient for most people's needs. Is there a prophylactic protocol for an anticipated avian influenza pandemic?
The notion that ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were unnecessary in the fight against COVID-19 has always served the official narrative quite conveniently, especially given how these generic, off-patent drugs posed a direct threat to the pharmaceutical industry’s multi-billion-dollar vaccine and therapeutic pipeline. But if we scrutinize the true contours of the COVID-19 saga—not by corporate press releases, but by the observable suppression of cheap, effective alternatives—it becomes clear that the real agenda was never public health, but control, profit, and global governance consolidation under the guise of a "health emergency."
Vitamin D, in that context, emerges not as an afterthought but as a central suppressed prophylactic. A simple, widely available, non-patentable nutrient that numerous studies (systematically downplayed or ignored) indicated was strongly associated with reduced severity of COVID-19 symptoms and mortality. That fact alone should have caused upheaval—yet it was met with deafening silence. Why? Because the WHO and its enablers had already committed to the vaccine-first paradigm, where no early treatment could be allowed to show promise, lest it undercut the emergency use authorizations (EUAs) for mRNA products.
Now, as Nick Fleetwood and others have begun to document, the next pandemic is already being previewed like a film trailer, with the WHO assuming even more sweeping powers under the International Health Regulations (IHR) amendments and the proposed “Pandemic Treaty.” The avian influenza threat—specifically H5N1—is being positioned as the next pretext for this expanded global regime.
Just as with COVID-19, vitamin D sufficiency will likely be a foundational factor in determining outcomes in any viral respiratory outbreak. The suppression of this fact during the COVID episode only underscores its potential. Maintaining optimal serum levels (likely far above the deficient thresholds endorsed by mainstream medicine) is a low-cost, low-risk strategy for enhancing innate immunity.
Despite the orchestrated takedown of ivermectin’s credibility, the drug has demonstrated broad-spectrum antiviral properties, which, though unacknowledged by official bodies, make it a candidate worth considering for prophylactic use against other viral threats—including avian influenza. As with COVID-19, early and prophylactic use is key, rather than waiting for full-blown infection.
Quercetin, a natural ionophore, paired with zinc, may again prove useful. Zinc interferes with viral replication, while quercetin facilitates its cellular uptake. This combination was quietly recommended by frontline physicians who were censored or ignored during the early COVID-19 crisis.
Other low-cost substances such as melatonin (anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory), N-acetylcysteine (NAC) (mucolytic and antioxidant), and vitamin C may all have roles in a broader, integrative prophylactic protocol—one that has no place in the WHO-approved “one pathogen, one solution” mindset.
It is imperative to understand that whatever prophylactic protocol proves effective—be it natural, generic, or repurposed—it will not be endorsed by official agencies unless it aligns with the interests of pharmaceutical cartels and their captured regulators. Any successful prophylactic that bypasses vaccine dependency or corporate therapeutics will be systematically maligned or buried, as it was during COVID-19.
Yes, there is a prophylactic strategy for a future avian influenza pandemic, but it will not come from the WHO, the CDC, or the pharmaceutical industry. It will come, as it did during COVID, from censored doctors, independent researchers, and those willing to question the official narrative. The real challenge will not be in discovering effective treatments—it will be in disseminating that information before it’s suppressed. And based on how COVID-19 unfolded, we can predict with grim certainty that the next health emergency will involve not only a viral pathogen but an information lockdown even more sophisticated than the last.
The only true prophylaxis is skepticism—of official narratives, of centralized authority, and of any “solution” that demands obedience over inquiry.
Louisiana Business Owner: "That's correct."
California Business Owner: "That's illegal. I'm sending you a cease and desist order."
Louisiana Business Owner: "No, you registered your business in California. Since your governor set precedence where Californians don't need to recognize laws of other states, our state doesn't need to recognize the laws of California. You can take your useless cease and desist order and stick it."
I laughed.
T.B. Yoits:
“T.B. Yoits
California Business Owner: “You’re using the name of my business as yours.”
Louisiana Business Owner: “That’s correct.”
California Business Owner: “That’s illegal. I’m sending you a cease and desist order.”
Louisiana Business Owner: “No, you registered your business in California. Since your governor set precedence where Californians don’t need to recognize laws of other states, our state doesn’t need to recognize the laws of California. You can take your useless cease and desist order and stick it.”
This isn't just legal and procedural, it's psychological - we're witnessing adults who have never grown past childhood stages. They're not even adolescents.
Anything I order from India ships in a day, arrives in customs, clears in two days, and is delivered by the USPS.
Ivermectin.com is where I bought both HCQ and Invermectin.
The Ivermectin was much cheaper, too.
Compounded in India, shipped from an American address.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.