Lately, he has been all about Epstein, the spending is an after thought that gets mentioned only when closing down the fgovernment becomes an issue. Thomas Massie spoke out against the actions of federal immigration agents following the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti, redaction of the Epstein files by the Department of Justice (DOJ), and he is more than willing to partner up with Ro Kahanna, even though Ro hs never brought up the Epstein isue previously.
Thomas Massis says he opposes big spending, foreign wars, and cover-ups involving sex traffickers. Trump & ICE have found more than any other presuident of children trafficked. What do reporters report, that Trump detention of children are 6 times higher than any previous president. When in fact these are children that have been found and are part of the 300,000 children that the Biden Administration let go with whomevrer claimed them, most being trafficers. Trump starts no wars, he ends them. Trump is not spending all of the money that was allocated, unless a court orders him to do so. With a Republican majority, why hasn't they made is easier for Trump to not speand all of the money, and return it to the Treasury?
The soy boi never acknowledges these moves taken by Trump, but he is quick to cut him to the bone at every possible opportunity, and he doesn't understand why Trump trashes him bacK? He's an idiot, but you hold him up as this great man.
Why do you have a problem with transparency?
I have no problem with transparency, however, dragging people though something when it is unclear exaclty what has been done regarding the Epstein case, which has been mostly driven by specculation. Would you like that happening to you, just because you knew someone, and saw them on several occasions, and even attended parties at their house, but you never did anything illegal? Do you think that is fair to you, to be associated as being a nefarious questionable scumbag person, by virtue of that association?
What are you so quick to see evil is all who associated with Epstein? Epstein seems to be a scumbage, and perhaps some of those who hung around him are also, but not all. He is a rich man who knows a lot of people, and there are those who feel more important because they are close to someone who is a mover/shaker in their eyes. Again, you do so because your idol has made you believe that there is a lot more to Epstein than there actually is. Viginia Giuffre was no angel, she was not forced to remain Epsteins sphere, she remained for the money, period. She even became a procurer for more girls, and made more money doing that too. That has been proven. She finally admitted that she made uup that she had slept with Prince Andrew. So, was this all dpne for these women to receive a big pay day from these wealthy men? Sort of like E. Jean Carroll who was awarded 3.3 million, which she has never gotten a penny, nor does she deserve that money, because it was all based on lies, and they changed the law in order to make it possible to bring the BS charges that had under the law expired years ago under the existing statue of limitations. This epstein started taking tking shape after the "Me Too' , all women must be believe, becaoiome a thing. What a prefect atmosphere for thse calims to be used.
Your own posts show he is concerned about thigns other than Epstein. I suggest you read your own postings: Massie criticized Trump’s rhetoric and foreign policy moves
Again, that is more BS that Thomas Massie engages in, and you left off the Venezuela word as well in what you posted that I said. The Venezuela was a well organized strike to take a narco-terrorist, Nicolás Maduro, who is responsible for killing mamy A,ericans via illegal drugs, especial Fentanyl. Again, that is not something he is doing, it is another way for him to attack Trump.
Apparently, like you, Thomas Massie doesn't realize that these are warfare like attacks upon this nation, maaking money is a bonus for that warfare waged against this nation. Both could use a brain, sadly enough because neither of you recognize that reality.
You must be an anti-Trump just like your idol Thomas Massie is. Both ou you are losers. Difference being he is a do nothing Congressman who only complains, and does whatever he can to thwart Trump at every turn. You are just supporting yet another Libertarian politician, who has run as a Republican, because Libertarians have a bad track record of getting elected. We voted in Trump, where he won the eectoral vote, along with the popular vote. Thus the people gave Trump a mandate. Massie 's mandate is coming from those who hate this nation, because it is evident that he supports their wants, more than he supports the the majority of the American citizenarry who provided Trump a clear mandate to do what he campaigned on.
You may agree with him or disagree with him. Please tell me what that has to do with Epstein, since you claim that's all Massie cares about.
As I said, I agree with him on the out-of-control spending. Epstein is nothing more thamn a distraction. He needs to focus on the real duty that the legislature is Constitutionally responsible for, which are the legisation & passing the budget for government spending.
I disagree with him on his Trump hatred, and the legal actions he takes regarding deporatation & bringing a murderous illegitimate foreigh president to face the indictment handed down by the Southern New York grand jury. I do not need Thomas Massie's opinion which is about as worthless as the opinion of any other never-Truumper or Hollowwood actor/actress or singer that are nothing but hate driven rhethoric that shows they hate, while claiming that they are about love.
He's a joke If oyu consider constitutionalism, strong limited government views, 91% party support, and grades in teh high 90s from most conservative rating services to be a "joke."
I already adressed that, but I will repeat it again for you:
That conservative rating is nothing more than opinion based. There really do not tell the entire picture, because he often strays from his Constittution role by providing his opinion of someone that he disagrees with. It is not his constitutional duty to provide his opinion regarding the president who was duly elected 3 times, but the middle one was stolen, and with the help from Republican politician's who thought it was their right to overrule what the people voted for. They all had to ignore the oath to defend & protect the Constitution, not their beliefs, anmd that goes for Massie as well.
yopu can't poiont to a single accomplishment tht has meant muc for this nation. Massie has introduced, sponsored or co-sponsored, and voted for plenty of bills you and I could gladly support. It's not his fault that the RINO Establishment leadership killed them. We need more like him, not fewer. We need fewer RINOs, not more. But keep plugging for those RINOs because President Trump keeps endorsing them.
Trump endorsed Thomas Massie previosly. But not anymore. So, by your own words that makes Massie a RINO also. Like the RINO he is, he knows when something will not pass, so he can vote the conservative vote. I have disagreed with some of Trump's endorsements, but often times the voters ignored his endorsements and voted in the person that provided no support for Trump. In Massie's case, it's people like you who are fooled about who he and others really are, which is never-Trumper RINOs first who have lots of opportunities to present themselves as being something else, and still many like you do not see the truth regardiong realize what these RINOs actuallyty are, controlled by, Democrats. opposition .
Aolso, you still haven't pointed to any of Thomas Massie's real accomplishments after 13 years of being in the U.S. Congressional House.
And President, via OMB (Executive Branch), submit a budget for Congress to consider. Again, it's not Massie's job.
it doesn't preclude Massie who is in the legislature to take a lead on the budget/spending issue
True, and he does so with his votes and by offering amendments. But he is not leadership, not Budget Committee, so he's not responsible for working up a budget, merely for voting on it like any other Member. And if he submitted one, your boy Johnson would simply sideline it.
Lately, he has been all about Epstein
False statement. He's been just as active on spending and budget issue, foreign policy issues, and the like. Just because you're laser focused on a single issue doesn't mean he is. You're simply regurgitating untrue statements you've been fed.
Thomas Massis says he opposes big spending, foreign wars, and cover-ups involving sex traffickers. Trump & ICE have found more than any other presuident of children trafficked.
Good, nobody has a problem with that, but again, they find plenty, then fail to include it in their legislation. And when they do, they bundle it in a so-called Omnibus or a CR with lots of Democrat crap in it. OBBB had a bunch of that. Massie couldn't vote for that.
Trump starts no wars, he ends them.
He took unilateral military action in Venezuela. That was an act of war. Fortunately, we had very few casualties. But CONGRESS declares war and the AUMF that all President use applied to Iraq; it wan't an unlimited Grant of authority.
Trump is not spending all of the money that was allocated, unless a court orders him to do so.
Congress just reauthorized the Biden spending levels. What, specifically, is Trump not spending? And by what authority?
With a Republican majority, why hasn't they made is easier for Trump to not speand all of the money, and return it to the Treasury?
Why can't he, and why would you want him to spend more?
The soy boi never acknowledges these moves taken by Trump, but he is quick to cut him to the bone at every possible opportunity
More of your falsehoods.
iI have no problem with transparency, however, dragging people though something when it is unclear exaclty what has been done regarding the Epstein case, which has been mostly driven by specculation.
Then let's get the files out UNREDACTED so we can get real information and end the speculation. Why would you have a problem with that?
What are you so quick to see evil is all who associated with Epstein?
I have said no such thing, but it is obvious that Epstein and Maxwell trafficked someone to someone, or we wouldn't have convicted them (especially considering Epstein was a Democrat, and probably still votes for them), and we wouldn't be having this conversation.
It appears you automatically disbelieve any and all of these women. Giuffre said she never saw Trump do anything wrong; was she lying then, or are you just selective about what you want to believe and what you don't want to believe, as the Democrats are?
they changed the law in order to make it possible to bring the BS charges that had under the law expired years ago under the existing statue of limitations.
True. It's how Democrats play the game. It also isn't relevant to this particular discussion; it has zero bearing on Massie. Please try to focus.
Massie criticized Trump’s rhetoric and foreign policy moves
Yes, and? You seem to think it's all about personal loyalty, following President Trump on every issue completely, no matter what he says or does. It isn't. It's about advancing principles.
Why does President Trump endorse RINOs like Lindsey Graham?
Thomas Massie doesn't realize that these are warfare like attacks
That's precisely why Massie's concern is. When we were attacked in 1941, FDR asked for and got a declaration of war the next day. Massie is asking the President to seek a Congressional declaration of war. You cna't just go around using force.
"America goes not forth searching for monsters to destroy." -- John Quincy Adams
Cuba and Iran seem to be teetering on the brink without the USA using force.
As I said, I agree with him on the out-of-control spending.
Yet both the OBBB & the CR increased or maintained the excessive spending.That just increases our debt.
We voted in Trump
Which doesn't empower him to just do anything he wants.
he is a do nothing Congressman who only complains, and does whatever he can to thwart Trump at every turn.
That's just nonsense. Nothing in his record supports that, but you'll double down on it because you' e been told it's so.
Massie 's mandate is coming from those who hate this nation, because it is evident that he supports their wants
You're being ridiculous. There eis literally nothing that supports you dumb claim.
I disagree with him on his Trump hatred
He hates Trump so much that he voted for him three times and married a woman who voted for him three times. You sound stupid when you say things like that.
That conservative rating is nothing more than opinion based.
It's based on his voting record.
that makes Massie a RINO
Incorrect. He is anything but. You seem to define RINO as anyone who doesn't slavishly follow whatever opinion President Trump happens to hold on any given issue on any given day. I don't. I define it by principles, policies, votes. If you're running around raising money for Lindsey Graham, you have no business calling your opponents RINOs.
people like you who are fooled about who he and others really are
No, quite the opposite.
Aolso, you still haven't pointed to any of Thomas Massie's real accomplishments after 13 years of being in the U.S. Congressional House.
What do you consider accomplishments? Massie has been essential in stopping a lot of bad laws, which is at least as important as passing good ones. And the good ones he's proposed have had bipartisan opposition that prevented him from getting them passed because of the get-along go-along types tou've spent all that space defending.