Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom Brady Named In Newly Released Jeffrey Epstein Emails, And Everyone Is Wondering What The **** Is Going On [PHOTO]
TOTALPROSPORTS ^ | February 2, 2026 | Darrelle Lincoln

Posted on 02/05/2026 10:54:13 AM PST by nickcarraway

Tom Brady has appeared in the Epstein Files.

Following the release of a new batch of Justice Department documents, we have now seen Tom Brady’s name appear in the Epstein files.

Convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein connected Giants co-owner Steve Tisch with multiple women. Tisch said he knew Jeffrey Epstein but denied going to his island after his name was mentioned more than 400 times.

“We had a brief association where we exchanged emails about adult women, and in addition, we discussed movies, philanthropy, and investments,” Tisch said in a statement.

“I did not take him up on any of his invitations and never went to his island. As we all know now, he was a terrible person and someone I deeply regret associating with.”

Russell Wilson was also mentioned in the Epstein emails. The ten-time Pro Bowl quarterback refuted any connection with notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein after his name was referenced. Several emails from Epstein and his personal pilot, Larry Visoski, were among the millions of pages of documents. In them, the two discussed Wilson’s interest in buying Epstein’s Gulfstream G-IV private jet in 2019.

It does not appear that Wilson and Epstein ever had a conversation or met.

“Why is this redacted?” He asked his followers. The post went viral immediately, with more than 487,000 Twitter users interacting with it. In the picture was a redacted part of an email chain that included the name of a prominent quarterback.

Tom Brady was mentioned in the Epstein Files. On December 8, 2017, an email appeared with his name in the subject line. It said, “Alert – fat head of Tom Brady.” It was sent at 1 pm. Who it was to and from was redacted.

A Fathead is a vinyl wall decal or large foam-core cutout featuring NFL players. It is unknown why the person was asking for it or if it was code for something else.


TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS: epstein; epsteinemails; epsteinobsession; fakeprospects; fakeprosports; jeffreyepstein; russellwilson; tombrady; trumpisnamedmore
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: nickcarraway

It’s the new “Bacon Game”. Six Degrees of Jeffrey Epstein.


21 posted on 02/05/2026 11:16:30 AM PST by dfwgator ("I am Charlie Kirk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy
That isn't correct. Remember, before the election, the Democrats didn't want it release, and weren't Trump/Republicans the ones who wanted it released?. After all, Biden was president for four years, why wasn't it released then?

The inflection point was after Trump took office, Bondi/Trump or whoever backed off from releasing it all. Of course, the Democrats were going to seize that as an opportunity to ding Trump. Both sides ignore that it was the opposite before the election.

Of course, Trump or Bondi should have realized, that that would be used against them.

Also, there are a lot of people, Republican, Democrat, etc. who don't want it out there. Even people who wouldn't have been caught dead with Epstein. Just because of the chaos it could cause. Maybe that's why Trump and Bondi lst their appetite for releasing it. And yes, there are probably people mentioned in these files that had nothing to do with anything bad.

22 posted on 02/05/2026 11:16:46 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: albie

Don’t know if he did. That’s the problem with all this redacting. All we know is the subject refers to an available product with Tom Brady’s face on it. Who to whom and why? All redacted. It’s stupid. DOJ was told to release all the documents, no redacting, so we could actually KNOW, and instead they just turned it into a giant rumor mill.


23 posted on 02/05/2026 11:18:09 AM PST by discostu (like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Correct. Trump said that innocent people would get smeared by guilt by association. I would rather see the video and pictures that the FBI took out of Epstein’s vault in NYC. That’s where the dirt is.


24 posted on 02/05/2026 11:19:36 AM PST by DeplorablePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: albie

Does this email really suggest he was that involved?


25 posted on 02/05/2026 11:19:57 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“””and weren’t Trump/Republicans the ones who wanted it released?.”””

Nobody cared before and nobody cares now.

The democrats, including mASSie, needed another RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA. This is what they settled on. Now they can babble about a cover up and other nonsense.


26 posted on 02/05/2026 11:23:40 AM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: albie

If you see my name, we only talked about church matters.


27 posted on 02/05/2026 11:23:55 AM PST by AppyPappy (They don't call you a Nazi because they think you are one. They do it to justify violence. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

So you don’t remember the last few years, when Biden was president, when many people on the right wanted it released? You are 100% determined to make Biden out to be the heroic, good guy?


28 posted on 02/05/2026 11:26:28 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Tom Brady was mentioned in the Epstein Files. On December 8, 2017, an email appeared with his name in the subject line. It said, “Alert – fat head of Tom Brady.” It was sent at 1 pm. Who it was to and from was redacted. A Fathead is a vinyl wall decal or large foam-core cutout featuring NFL players. It is unknown why the person was asking for it or if it was code for something else.

"Mentioned in the Epstein files" is becoming an utterly meaningless phrase at this point. All of these "files" include people's private conversations about a host of topics that don't have a thing to do with Epstein's island and the like. Essentially this headline is defamatory as the implication is something different than what the information yields.

Things like this is why it is practical to not "release everything."

29 posted on 02/05/2026 11:29:00 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4363806/posts
Politics Strange Bedfellows: Meet the PAC Working to Reelect Thomas Massie—And Partnering With the DSA to Fight ICE The embattled Kentucky congressman traveled to Pennsylvania to meet with IPAC around the time its founder wrote his campaign a check. Thomas Massie poses with IPAC chairman Rafed Aljoboury

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4363639/posts
Kentucky’s Massie joins Dems in refusing to vote to fund ICE as US House passes 4 spending bills

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4315688/posts
Lone Republican becomes only lawmaker to vote against crackdown on human organ trafficking (Massie)

A bill aimed at cracking down on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its practice of forced organ harvesting passed with overwhelming support on Wednesday – though one House lawmaker voted against it.

Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., was the lone Republican to oppose the Stop Forced Organ Harvesting Act, which passed 406-1.

“It’s just another example of us trying to stick our nose in another country’s business and write their laws,” Massie told Fox News Digital after the vote. “And at the end of the day, they’re gonna do what they’re gonna do, and it’s just sort of a virtue signal over here.”

...

But his pushback is also notable now given his status as an open critic of Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and at times, of President Donald Trump.

The bill was introduced by Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., and would authorize the Secretary of State to deny U.S. passports and visitor visas to people involved in organ trafficking circles.

It would also call for sanctions on entities and individuals found to have participated in the gruesome illicit industry.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4324812/posts
‘Mofo...in the White House’: Jasmine Crockett attacks Trump, praises Massie in anti-Iran strike rant
‘There’s only one Republican that I know I can count on for sure doing the right thing,’ Rep Crockett says in a new video

Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, launched another tirade against President Donald Trump over the weekend, while offering rare praise for one of her House GOP colleagues who is currently at odds with the commander in chief.

The Democratic firebrand took to Instagram Live late Saturday to criticize Trump’s strikes on Iran, while giving a “shout out” to Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., over his bipartisan resolution to rein in the president’s ability to conduct such operations.

“So long story short, for those of you that are unaware, the mofo that resides in the White House has unilaterally, in my estimation, declared war,” Crockett said in the video.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4325539/posts

Massie bucks GOP leadership again on Adam Schiff censure vote, draws conservative ire

Conservatives are conveying anger with northern Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie over his vote to oppose a resolution censuring California Rep. Adam Schiff, a favorite boogeyman of Republicans. Massie joined 19 other House Republicans in defecting from party leadership from condemning Schiff for championing the investigatory onslaught against former President Donald Trump. Combined with unanimous Democratic opposition, the measure failed, surprising even Schiff. The libertarian-leaning Massie claimed the resolution was unconstitutional for a clause that instructed Schiff should be fined $16 million if the House Ethics Committee found he “lied, made representations and abused sensitive information.” “Allowing a majority of Congress to take $16 million (92 years of pay) from any member of Congress is shortsighted,” Massie tweeted again of the Wednesday evening vote. “Can we not imagine a time when this precedent would be used against conservatives? Fortunately it failed.” Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, a Florida freshman, said Massie was “making misrepresentations about the bill” she authored. A band of pro-Trump political figures went even further, casting doubts about Massie’s reasoning and calling for his defeat. Massie has endorsed Trump rival, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination. “Not only is he being duplicitous, partisan and moronic about his choice – he’s straight up lying about the Constitution to achieve his political end goals. Sick,” wrote Raheem Kassam, a British political activist and editor in chief of The National Pulse.


30 posted on 02/05/2026 11:30:55 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: albie

“” we discussed movies, philanthropy, and investments,” Tisch said in a statement””

Tisch added: “and we only bought Playboy Magazine for the articles.” ...


31 posted on 02/05/2026 11:31:05 AM PST by catnipman ((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

What do you think should be forthcoming in the way of “justice served”? It sounds like you have knowledge or something that should be pursued as far as criminal charges?


32 posted on 02/05/2026 11:32:20 AM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“””So you don’t remember the last few years, when Biden was president, when many people on the right wanted it released?””””””

Who are these people that wanted it released?

Nobody cares. Most of this stuff happened many years ago. Nobody will be charged because of the statute of limitations.

If you start throwing out names and accusing them of crimes the civil suits will start flying.

If all these “survivors” want it released they can just put out the names themselves.

It’s a distraction for people who have nothing else to do.
And people who waste their days listening to conspiracy kooks on podcasts.

RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA is now EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN. It’s like a soap opera for the slow people.


33 posted on 02/05/2026 11:33:54 AM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: albie
Brady could have any woman with the snap of his fingers. Why go the perv route?

Where are you getting that he did?

As you can see, the headline had the effect it wanted on you.

Someone in a comment in the files mentioned a Tom Brady cutout. Therefore, "Tom Brady is mentioned in the Epstein files."

"mentioned in the Epstein files" is becoming a meaningless fact if this is what people are going to make news stories out of...those who actually did something bad are going to be ignored and drowned out by this kind of nonsense.

34 posted on 02/05/2026 11:34:12 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NEMDF

Okay, you claim Epstein and Clinton never committed a crime. Then, don’t they have the right to be vindicated through an investigation.


35 posted on 02/05/2026 11:35:27 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DeplorablePaul

And look at the above comment who actually implies this story exonerates Massie. Unless there is something else besides someone making a comment about Tom Brady, this is a smear...and they endorse it. Those of us who find this inappropriate are suffering from “MDS” he says. It’s extraordinary, but not a surprise from someone that uses this forum to promote their personal blog.


36 posted on 02/05/2026 11:37:08 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
Things like this is why it is practical to not "release everything."

In theory yes. But we see how not "releasing everything" goes. The powerful make sure the relevant info never gets released. That's how Epstein got a sweetheart deal, and went free for another 13 years.

37 posted on 02/05/2026 11:37:25 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Yes, that’s also true at the same time. Which is a shame.


38 posted on 02/05/2026 11:38:21 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
At this rate, I think every famous person but Trump will show up in the Epstein files.
39 posted on 02/05/2026 11:39:12 AM PST by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
All of Epstein's operations were located in U.S. jurisdiction: the U.S. Virgin Islands, Florida, New Mexico, and New York. Assuming there is evidence of Bill Clinton, or anyone else for that matter, having sex with a minor, that would be grounds for prosecution, as I don't believe there is a statute of limitations. It could be prosecuted under Federal or state law, although Florida is the only trustworthy jurisdiction at the state level. New York and New Mexico are controlled by leftists.

The question arises: does the Administration have the courage to prosecute Bill Clinton or any other wealthy and connected parties who engaged in sex with minors? Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche has already stated that there will be no prosecutions from the Epstein files, so that is the answer unless there is vigorous public demand for prosecution.

40 posted on 02/05/2026 11:43:07 AM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson