Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MtnClimber

At Davos yesterday Trump said that those who perpetrated the steal of the 2020 election would soon be charged and tried. You just know that the Clinton Foundation “donations” happened - along with the claims that Hillary was 90% likely to win the election in 2016 - were because these people knew the Venezuelans got to decide who won the election.

And now we can pretty much guess why she didn’t. The same reason Kamala didn’t win 2024 in spite of Dominion/Smartmatic’s attempt to steal it: the Dominion servers in Serbia (installed by John Brennan’s peeps) were blocked from uploading the fabricated results into the machines in the US swing states.

I’m hoping that the prosecutions that come connect ALL these things into a great big treason prosecution for those directly involved with Venezuela et al, and seditious conspiracy charges for everybody else. With ALL the cases tried at Gitmo, where there has been a huge expansion to accommodate massive numbers of prisoners.


8 posted on 01/22/2026 7:56:46 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: All

Investigations and, tell-all books like “Clinton Cash” alleged Hillary had
potential conflicts, plus “pay-to-play” deals favored Clinton Foundation donors.

Many Foundation donors did meet with the SOS, raising
significant ethical questions about access and influence.

The State Department denied evidence of undue influence, but emails revealed internal concerns about donor access, with some interactions between donors and the State Department occurring.

“Clinton Cash” Author Peter Schweizer alleged that foreign governments and entities making large donations to the Clinton Foundation received favorable treatment or access from the State Department under Hillary Clinton, citing examples like lucrative uranium deals.


Foundation Donors Met with Clinton

An AP review found many individuals meeting with Clinton as Secretary of State had donated to the Foundation, sometimes significantly, highlighting access issues.

Emails showed State Dept staffers worried about appearances, with Clinton publicly declining to attend a Morocco foundation event after the King pledged $12 million to the Clintons, though the Clintons attended the event later...... without fanfare.


Hillary stupidly defended the Clinton Foundation as a “charity”;
critics argued it blurred lines between public service and personal profit.

The privileged access SOS Hillary granted to Clinton donors may have translated into policy decisions, with the available evidence showing strong connections and donor access but direct bribery or unlawful exchange has still to be proven.


21 posted on 01/22/2026 8:17:39 AM PST by Liz (Jonathan Swift: Government without the consent of the governed is the very definition of slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson