“In the article they state wife & he as the victim, “
The wife is not listed as a victim.
“so I am not sure why roommate is used. “
Roommate used to describe an unrelated person sharing the house.
“Unless he is a biological female who identifies as male
That is a weird assumption!
“but the children have to be adults unless one is much younger than the 63 age they attrubite to the perp.”
The children belong to the victim and his wife, not to the perp.
According to court documents, Carolyn Marie Chalfant, 63, added bleach or peroxide to the leftover spaghetti that was set out for the victim.
This was allegedly after the victim’s wife and children finished eating.
Panama City Police reported that once the victim returned home, Chalfant turned on the stove to reheat the spaghetti, and after the victim made himself a bowl.
It was reported that the victim realized it tasted odd after he ate about four bites. His wife then tasted the spaghetti and told him not to eat anymore because it smelled like bleach.
I had said that he was the victim, the article states that the older female roommate added the foreign substance. The wife tasted it after he had tried 4 bites and told him not to eat anymore.
So, was the older lady the roommate living in a married couple's, with children, home?
I couldn't remember the spefics, but the story is confusing, and hy is the roommate & not the wife undersuspicion as well.
Now, I admit that I din't click, and I still haven't Perhap's in the article the information not present in th epost is there. The pictue provided shows her in the jail dressed in jail issued clothing so naturally that makes her look even worse than she probably presented herself when inquiring about the room for rent.
I may even be mistaken that that she was renting from them, and that the whole family wasn't renting from her.
My response to the other Freeper is that the post itself is confusing as posted. Becuase it listed the wife & and children, and that he was the victim. Yet, the headline Sais she poisened the roommate, whick implies that he was renting from her It is also singular. If he owns the house, she is the rommate, not him.
Besides that you knew exactly what I was saying, because I said he was the victim, not the wife, which was the first part of the sentence, separated by a comma, and he was the victim. My intent was that one would have to read the story further, because what is posted in unclear.
This is because you always are trying to prove that you are smart and I am dub. I make mistakes, and when I do I admit to my mistakes.
You on the other hand repeatedlty make mistakes, and you never own up to your mistakes.
As always, have yourself a blessed day.