Posted on 12/30/2025 7:28:35 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET
Judging from the overwhelming preponderance of black characters in the commercials on the NFL games streaming last weekend it is clear that black viewers are the main customers of the sports streaming services. Given that blacks have been oppressed in North America since 1619, the fees for streaming sports programs in the U.S. are clearly racist and unjust to black people.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Perhaps the voters are getting wiser in the case of KC not getting their stadium improvements. Taylor Swift won’t be coming around much longer either.
If it comes down to no NFL or no books, what do you expect?
DIRTYSECRET wrote: “This article is a bit tongue-in-cheek but it seems odd that a nationally televised game cannot be shown for free when taxpayers build the stadiums and access roads to varying degrees. We shouldn’t have to pay extra just because the game is played out of market.”
Every thing should be free, right?
Taxpayers paid for the roads leading to the grocery store. Shouldn’t groceries be free?
Taxpayers paid for the airports. Shouldn’t air travel be free too?
This attempt to make NETFLIX profitable will fail. Americans are cheap.
NETFLIX with no adds is expensive.
“overwhelming preponderance of black characters in the commercials”
Oh no!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYtJo1z62Wg&list=RDDYtJo1z62Wg&start_radio=1
If you had to do a shot every time a commercial featured black people, you’d be face-down unconscious on the floor before the end of the second commercial break.
It's not just the NFL games. Whites have become token characters in virtually every commercial.
Exactly, taxpayers build multi billion dollar stadiums for billionaire owners and then have to pay more for streaming services to watch the games because they can't afford the $1000 for two tickets.
Better to have viewers who are priced out of sport packages glued to their phones while visiting sports book sites. /sarc
100% - I paid $12 to watch that pack/ravens game- one month subscription
to peacock.
it’s hard to buy a beer for 12 bucks at the stadium
It’s like the cig companies advertising Newports in Jet magazine, black colleges and ghettos in the 70’s and 80’s.
I think the guy who buys a 6 pack to drink at home is where the real NFL money comes from. It’s like economy vs. first class on a plane. Airlines need the po’ folk.
Bkmk
This attempt to make NETFLIX profitable will fail. Americans are cheap.
NETFLIX with no adds is expensive.
Netflix has 300 million subscribers worldwide. Netflix is available in every country and territory except for China, North Korea, Syria, and Russia.
I have not figured out completely how they are making money, but they are not going out of business anytime soon.
There goal is dominate mulitpe entertainment markets: Streaming, gaming, international, production, etc.
That is why they want to buy Warner Bros. and other entertainment companies. Quite frankly, I see it as their only achiles heal. May of their predessers have been brought down by the deside to be the biggest. AOL comes to mind.
In looking for subscriber info, I found this nugget.
The Middle East And Africa (EMEA) Has 101.13 Million Netflix Subscribers
This makes EMEA the biggest regional market for Netflix, surpassing even the U.S. and Canada. The U.S. and Canada together have 89.63 million subscribers, showing that while Netflix remains strong in its home market, international growth has clearly taken the lead.
In the Asia Pacific region, Netflix has reached 57.54 million subscribers, thanks to the rising popularity of regional content like K-dramas, anime, and Bollywood-style originals. This region continues to show huge potential for future growth.
Latin America follows closely with 53.33 million subscribers, proving to be another solid and consistent market for Netflix.
https://www.demandsage.com/netflix-subscribers/
I look at it this way. Blacks were underrepresented for the first 20 years of television. It wasn’t racism. Advertisers were just aiming for the largest demographic and that happened to be white people. Now that America has become more balkanized, advertisers want inclusion and the only demographic group that doesn’t give a flip about being in commercials are white people. Competent white hetero people, that is. Even the black guy in our group has noticed this.
I have an Amazon Firestick that has an app that lets me stream sports programming from other countries for free. So, for NFL games, I watch on the Canadian channels or the British channels. Still a lot of blacks (they all love Patrick Mahomes because he’s a Mulatto) but there are noticeably more whites.
And there were a lot of whites during the holidays because, face it, companies still love to sell products, especially during Thanksgiving and Christmas.
Happy Kwanzaa, y’all!
Uh the deal the state of Kansas offered was so one sided in favor of Chiefs they couldn’t turn down
I’m sure you’re right. Does the voting public have the right to embrace the suck? Since 99% watch the games on TV are the billionaire owners entitled to the public trough? It seem there Missouri voters got it even more right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.