If I had to guess, I’d bet that they’re going to say that because him and his furry buddy are obviously nuts, he’s not culpable for shooting Charlie.
Either that, or they’ll cite the Candace Owens thing and try to make Charlie the victim of a “vast Israeli conspiracy” and claim that their guy was just at the wrong place at the wrong time.
A jury might even go for it.
WHERE IS THE FURRY LOVER?
“or they’ll cite the Candace Owens thing”
Today I heard that the prosecutor has said that Candace is harming the case. Because of the damage she (and others) is doing, and the conspiracy theories being pushed, the case is so compromised that they may have to settle for a lesser charge on Robinson.
That stinks. Someone needs to take her out of media circulation.
I think Candace is saying Isreal is a factor because she us getting paid to muddy the waters for the jury in order to give the defense another explanation and motive for the killing other than the real killer, their client.