Somehow vowing to uphold the Constitution means something different to the leftist justices.
No need to read it. The Liberal justices know what outcome they want. The Constitution doesn't enter into it.
Thanks for posting. I am eager to see SCOTUS overturn the incorrectly decided ‘Humphrey’s Executor’ decision.
This could be the most significant decision of the last 30 years. I’ve been saying for years we need to take away power from the vast, unelected, unaccountable bureaucratic deep state.
Ending Roosevelt’s New Deal Administrative (i.e., Communist) State will be one of the most important things Trump can do to return the country to it’s citizens.
The idea that there are a class of people who are “experts” that are above the Congress and the Presidency is absurd. The regulations they promulgate are de facto laws which the populace are literally helpless to stop or change. The agencies and their heads should have no such power.
The answer to Justice Gorsuch’s question is that POTUS as chief executive does not need to apply laws he deems unconstitutional. Nothing in the constitution gives the judiciary the sole panel to determine that a law is unconstitutional, not can the judiciary actually compel POTUS to enforce its rulings on a statute’s constitutionality. Great president’s like Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln didn’t give a chit about the opinions of SCOTUS on certain matters.
Menton writes good stuff. I most often read her MC articles in relation to the sorry gov’t climate environment in New York state.