Why Think The J6 Fedsurrection Was Planned At This Secret Meeting In June 2020(Video and Grok summary)

Mike Benz YouTube ^ | December 7,2025 | Mike Benz

[Jayster]

Synopsis of “Why I Think The J6 Fedsurrection Was Planned At This Secret Meeting In June 2020”

This YouTube video, uploaded by independent journalist and commentator Darren Beattie (of Revolver News), runs approximately 25 minutes and presents a speculative but evidence-based theory that the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot—derisively termed the “J6 Fedsurrection” by the host—was not a spontaneous insurrection but a manufactured event orchestrated by federal intelligence agencies. Beattie argues that the groundwork was laid at a secretive June 2020 meeting involving key players from the military, intelligence community, and political operatives. The tone is investigative and urgent, blending on-screen narration, archival footage, declassified documents, and Beattie’s direct-to-camera analysis to build a case for government entrapment and cover-up. He calls for further congressional probes and public awareness to counter what he calls a “deep state” narrative.

Introduction and Main Thesis (0:00–5:00) Beattie opens with a recap of the January 6 events, framing them as a “psyop” (psychological operation) rather than an organic Trump supporter uprising. He claims the riot’s escalation was fueled by planted agitators—specifically, undercover federal informants and assets—to discredit the MAGA movement and justify crackdowns on dissent. The video’s core thesis: This plot originated at a clandestine June 4, 2020, meeting at the U.S. Army’s Fort Bragg (now Fort Liberty), attended by high-level officials including: • Jeremy Brown, a retired Green Beret and Oath Keepers member who infiltrated the meeting and later testified about it. • Representatives from the FBI, DHS, and military intelligence units. • Figures linked to the “Transition Integrity Project” (a bipartisan simulation of election chaos) and Ray Epps-like operatives (individuals accused of inciting the breach).

Beattie uses clips from Brown’s 2021 arrest and testimony to establish credibility, asserting the meeting was disguised as a “racial reconciliation” seminar but actually plotted “color revolution”-style tactics to provoke civil unrest post-2020 election.

Key Evidence Presented (5:00–15:00) The bulk of the video dissects primary sources, with Beattie overlaying screenshots, timelines, and video excerpts for emphasis: • Jeremy Brown’s Infiltration: Brown, running for Congress in Florida, posed as a recruit to attend the Fort Bragg session. He recorded discussions on using social media to amplify divisions, recruiting “unindicted co-conspirators” for protests, and staging false flags. Beattie highlights Brown’s affidavit (filed in his DOJ case), quoting lines like “They discussed how to manipulate patriots into violence.” • Documentary Ties: References declassified emails and memos from 2020 showing FBI/DHS coordination on “domestic terrorism” monitoring of Trump allies. Beattie connects this to the presence of over 200 FBI informants in J6 crowds (per whistleblower reports) and Ray Epps’ unprosecuted urging to “go into the Capitol.” • Timeline Overlaps: ◦ June 2020: Fort Bragg meeting. ◦ July–November 2020: Ramp-up of “Stop the Steal” monitoring by fusion centers. ◦ January 5–6, 2021: Deployment of undercover assets, per Beattie’s analysis of pipe bomber footage and unmasked provocateurs. • Visuals include side-by-side comparisons of J6 footage with 2014 Ukraine Maidan Revolution clips, suggesting imported “revolution tactics” from CIA playbooks. He names drops like Stewart Rhodes (Oath Keepers leader, convicted but allegedly FBI-handled) and Ken Peter (GCHQ-linked psyop expert).

Beattie stresses these aren’t coincidences, using a whiteboard-style graphic to map connections between attendees and J6 defendants. Analysis and Broader Implications (15:00–22:00) Shifting to commentary, Beattie analyzes how the “insurrection” label has been weaponized: • Entrapment Mechanics: Argues feds used “shepherding” (guiding crowds) and “avocado toast” tactics (feeding agitators to blend in) to ensure violence, then scapegoated Trump supporters. • Media/Government Collusion: Cites CNN and MSNBC clips downplaying Epps while amplifying “white supremacist” angles, tying back to the 2020 meeting’s media strategy discussions. • Current Relevance: Filmed amid 2024 election cycle echoes, Beattie warns of repeat setups, linking to RFK Jr.‘s warnings and House J6 Committee suppressions (e.g., ignoring Brown’s testimony). He critiques bipartisan complicity, noting Democrat-led probes ignored intel failures while Republicans like McCarthy slow-walked releases. Conclusion and Call to Action (22:00–End)

Beattie wraps with a stark warning: “J6 was the beta test for martial law under a stolen election narrative.” He urges viewers to support Revolver News, share the video, and pressure figures like Rep. Loudermilk for full declassifications. Ending on a defiant note with patriotic imagery, he quips, “If they can frame this as an insurrection, imagine what they’ll do next time.” Overall, the video is persuasive for skeptics of official J6 narratives, relying on open-source docs rather than leaks, but it’s unapologetically partisan—aimed at rallying the right against perceived deep-state overreach.

---

TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: coup; darrenbeattie; fbi; fedsurrection; j6; jan6th; maga; martiallaw; mikebenz; revolvernews; subversion

[Jayster]

Beattie wraps with a stark warning: “J6 was the beta test for martial law under a stolen election narrative.”

[Libloather]

Vote counting was halted at midnight so that battleground states could have Brandon votes inserted. Who called that shot?

[Jayster]

Exactly! And why isn’t the DOJ under Trump or the GOP looking into that?

[Joe Boucher]

250 + F-ing fbi agents egging folks in to the capitol?
Oh hell yeah it was orchestrated by our govt