A dog chases his tail around and around and around. He catches it in his teeth and tells his master, “You can’t catch my tail! Only I can!” The master responds, “You are useless on the hunt, and instead just chase your tail around. Good luck,” and takes the dog to the pound.
You logically prove that Neal has a checkered past, and then illogically use that to dismiss her present incarnation as a committed Israeli American ex pat. “Impossible!” You say. “She has a checkered past!” That dog does not hunt.
Belief in personal redemption is a shared belief among both Christians and Jews, but that does not even occur to you. Instead, you chase your tail around and glory in catching it, because you used logic and evidence to support a fact, but one that you use to reach to a fallacious and illogical conclusion.
The end. Find someone else to troll. I’m done.
You are intellectually dishonest.
You wrote:
“You logically prove that Neal has a checkered past, and then illogically use that to dismiss her present incarnation as a committed Israeli American ex pat. “Impossible!” You say. “She has a checkered past!” That dog does not hunt.”
I never doubted that she is a “committed Israeli American ex pat” - whatever the hell that means. Seriously, you’re creating straw men.