Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 12/06/2025 5:21:05 AM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
Candace Owens is facing significant scrutiny after she indicated she would not attend an in-person event geared toward addressing the various conspiracy theories she has promoted about the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
On Wednesday, The Charlie Kirk Show producer Blake Neff tore into Owens over her amplification of “lies” and “innuendos thrown around with a total, reckless disregard for the truth.”
“Ever since Charlie’s murder, Candace Owens has leveled a flood of allegations against people at Turning Point USA, people at Turning Point Action, and people who work for this show. She has made them against some of Charlie’s closest friends and against some of his most dedicated employees,” said Neff. “Even if not everyone has been named specifically, though, Candace has effectively tarred everyone here with complicity in Charlie’s death by repeatedly saying he was, quote, ‘betrayed by,’ quote, ‘everyone.’ She has said Charlie’s murder, quote, ‘had to be approved by Charlie’s friends,’ and then suggested those friends might have her murdered too for quote ‘knowing the truth.'”
He continued:
So here’s what is going to happen. In the near future, there will be a livestream here in Phoenix where we address in a clear and comprehensive way the claims and accusations, the false accusations that have been made against Charlie’s family, friends, and the people here at Turning Point. We plan to walk through everything carefully and thoroughly. If Candace is available, we would sincerely welcome her participation in that livestream at our studio here in Phoenix. At this point, we believe the ball is back in her court.
Subsequently, Neff provided a time and date for the event on X, writing:
The livestream we announced on the show Wednesday has been set.
At 4 pm Eastern, 2 pm local time on Monday, December 15, a collection of Charlie’s friends will respond to statements made by @RealCandaceO, to set the record straight once and for all prior to the opening of AmericaFest.
We’ll be live-streaming from Charlie’s Phoenix studio. Our offer from yesterday holds: If Candace wishes to join us in person in Phoenix, she is welcome to do so. She can let us know by the end of today.
Owens replied:
Kind of weird how you didn’t e-mail or call me to ask about times or availability and chose to instead tweet this confirmation out at midnight.
Why am I learning about this on X?
December 15th does not work in-person and 2pm PT is also literal time I do my podcast LIVE everyday (which you knew)— but we will happily cancel the daily podcast and will join you guys virtually instead for the livestream on the 15th if that works on your end?
Let’s lock it in?
“Will also add that I am happy to jump on Charlie’s show any day before then virtually as well. I was serious when I said we could do it today even. Virtually I can make it happen pretty much any day because it’s easier to move things around with the kids and find someone to sub for my morning homeschooling,” she added.
Given Owens’s previous declaration that Neff and his colleagues could “pick the place” and “pick the time” for the event, observers were less than impressed by her response.
“Yesterday, we made it clear that we would be scheduling a formal response to the allegations and accusations you have made. We’ve decided that response will be delivered during a livestream on December 15th,” replied Neff. “Thank you for your response letting us know you will not be joining the in-person conversation. We will be proceeding without you.”
Yesterday, we made it clear that we would be scheduling a formal response to the allegations and accusations you have made. We've decided that response will be delivered during a livestream on December 15th.
Thank you for your response letting us know you will not be joining the… https://t.co/mnhvqcqRFH
— Blake Neff (@BlakeSNeff) December 4, 2025
“This is exactly what she did when Ben Shapiro challenged her to sit down and have a discussion with him some years back,” observed RedState’s Bonchie. “At first, she rattled her sabre, but then flipped and started quibbling about the time and place. She’s a coward. Always has been.”
This is exactly what she did when Ben Shapiro challenged her to sit down and have a discussion with him some years back.
At first, she rattled her sabre, but then flipped and started quibbling about the time and place.
She's a coward. Always has been. https://t.co/QqtC1LY5wq
— Bonchie (@bonchieredstate) December 4, 2025
“‘[TPUSA] can pick the place, they can pick the time. I say we do it tomorrow; we don’t need to plan this.’ -Candace Owens right before rejecting TPUSA’s invitation because she didn’t like the place and the time,” wrote right-wing commentator Addison Smith, summarizing her reaction to this week’s events.
“[TPUSA] can pick the place, they can pick the time. I say we do it tomorrow; we don’t need to plan this.”
-Candace Owens right before rejecting TPUSA’s invitation because she didn’t like the place and the time. https://t.co/AgCJ6d3sQX
— Addison Smith (@AddisonSmithTV) December 5, 2025
But wait, there’s much, much more:
You were invited to TPUSA HQ to press their leadership live and in person about their role in Charlie Kirk’s murder, but you can’t go because of a scheduling conflict? LOL.
Isn’t this what you have been pushing for since September? Time to put up or shut up. https://t.co/8MeO4Km1Yq
— Nicholas J. Fuentes (@NickJFuentes) December 4, 2025
They invited you to participate. They didn't say that they would make it the Candace Owens Show and work around your schedule.
These are your allegations. It's incumbent on you to make the schedule work.
Kind of like checking spellcheck before typing the wrong base. https://t.co/QUDt0UylpI
— Rich Baris The People's Pundit (@Peoples_Pundit) December 4, 2025
you literally said they could pick a time and place bwahahahahahahahhahaha
a liar and a coward https://t.co/zg8Stz3nKw
— Jay Asliken 🕋☪️✈️ (@assliken) December 4, 2025
Candace Owens never had any real intentions of debating TPUSA this was always her plan.
She wanted them to invite her on the show so she could then spin it as if they’re trying to set her up to be killed.
This is her next grift and It was so predictable.
Her fans have already… https://t.co/iydzqKhIuT
— Cinema Shogun (@CinemaShogun) December 4, 2025
Candace says “anytime, anyplace”
TPUSA names a time and place.
Candace wimps out.
Got it. https://t.co/rgR8bM3HiE
— Matt Murphy (@mattmurphyshow) December 5, 2025
aaaaaaaaand Candace already backed out lol. They "only" gave her 2 weeks to plan for it and thus she will refuse to meet in person.
Come on Candy, that's not how your best friend on earth Charlie Kirk would handle it….he'd be there. https://t.co/y3Eo1vkohs
— TheQuartering (@TheQuartering) December 4, 2025
Hah! I knew it.
Candace: Any time anywhere, let ego TPUSA.
*TPUSA names a time and place*
Candace: Not then and not there. That doesn’t work for me.
😂😂😂 https://t.co/Zid75VFsQT
— Luke Edison (@RealLukeEdison) December 4, 2025
EVIDENCE: she's not an actual journalist and she doesn't actually believe the nonsense sh*t she spews. https://t.co/FrcN3ypvKQ
— everyoneislyingto you (@every1islying2u) December 5, 2025
Candace declining to do an in person show because she’s only given a 2 weeks heads up?
Look, I know she has a huge show and missing an ep is a big deal, but doesn’t she talk about Charlie every day?
You’d think she’d drop everything and do this at any time and any place. https://t.co/1JjPqfcrmF
— James Klüg (@realJamesKlug) December 4, 2025
She’s backing out. Again. https://t.co/96RpMHxqPE
— Strxwmxn (@strxwmxn) December 4, 2025
This is so dumb.
TPUSA didn't want to respond at all. Which is correct. They only responded because they were sick of you dragging Charlie's organization through the mud.
You don't get to dictate and approve any part of this. Especially not after saying any time any place. https://t.co/Xtt9zsDLa1
— Heimish Conservative (@HeimishCon) December 4, 2025
I just can't even believe the audacity of this woman https://t.co/ginTLqPPl3
— H. Pearl Davis (@pearlythingz) December 4, 2025
Is she too chicken to say it to their faces in the same room??? https://t.co/NJeRH9ZNpz
— Colonel Kurtz -PopCulture/ Politics/ MarilynManson (@colonelkurtz99) December 4, 2025
I looked back at my prior posts and I hadn't stated this clearly, so for the record: Candace Owens has become the single most evil person in the vicinity of the right and she has beat out some impressive competition on that front, quite handily
— Will Chamberlain (@willchamberlain) December 5, 2025
I do actually believe Satan has a hand in what Candace is doing to Charlie Kirk’s legacy.
When he was assassinated, an evangelical tidal wave was created that churches and pastors hadn’t seen before.
Now, that tidal wave is being drowned out by her insane attempt to destroy…
— Caleb Hull (@CalebJHull) December 5, 2025
Fun fact: Do you know what the fastest animal in the world is?
No, it's not a cheetah.
It's Candace Owens running from a debate. pic.twitter.com/L3wZj2AIiG
— Han Shawnity 🇺🇸 (@HanShawnity) December 5, 2025
“TPUSA expects Candace to join them 10 days before Christmas! She has kids!”
Erika Kirk has kids, too.
Kids with no father- and their first holiday without him has been consumed by her lies.
Here’s the world’s smallest violin for Candace’s homeschooling schedule: 🎻
— Jackie Chea ⚖️ (@Fair_and_Biased) December 5, 2025
— —
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
We will see. Bannon tends to have his own bias.
A pox on all of them.
Sure, Candace is some sort of operative, married to a Brit Lord or whatever, but TPUSA is brushing the larger incident under the rug with the clearly untrue cover story.
Not surprising that she wouldn’t go into the viper’s den of a set-up, TPUSA event.
Erika is the one who has the power to release the autopsy report but for some reason hasn’t done that. Why not considering all the questions raised? Like I’ve said TPUSA could have avoided all of this if they had been transparent from the beginning but instead remained tight lipped causing people to speculate that they might be hiding something.
“There won’t be a trial... Bannon told you... the fix is in.”
So Bannon agrees with Candace? Or at least doubts the official story?
Again, this is crazy stuff. You’re saying Erika is in on it? Why? And what does the autopsy prove anyway? Everyone agrees it was a single shot that hit him in the neck. You must be a member of the Keepers of Odd Knowledge Society.
Yes, you know more about what that gun will Do than people who own one like myself and Mr. GG2 and a hundred special ops trained snipers who shoot people in the neck all the time. 🙄
More grist for the mill. Melson laid off of Candace for many, many weeks, but I guess he finally had enough.
40 minutes long but worth watching to see some of Candace’s distortions and lunacy exposed.
Yeah, 30-06 usually causes more damage than what happened with Charlie Kirk, but not every time. What happened with him is not impossible.
I didn’t say Erika was in on it. What I’ve been saying is that the actions (or rather the non action) of TPUSA is what has lead to all of this speculation by Candace and others. There’s something rotten with the staff of TPUSA and it seems they are trying to hide things. I’m not saying they were involved in Charlie’s assassination but there’s definitely something going on behind the scenes that they don’t want out.
People are gullible and can easily be led down the conspiracy path by charlatans like Candace Owens, they do podcasts questioning everything about an event like Charlie Kirk’s death making outrageous accusations backed up by baseless evidence
Pretty much impossible. Especially in the neck. It would have been like a freight train. Most likely Kirk was shot at fairly close range by a smaller caliber weapon. Maybe the kid on the roof was a distraction. We will never get the real story just like we have never gotten the story about Butler, PA. Everything gets covered up. Even Trump says he hasn’t gotten the full details from his own assassination attempts.
You certainly are in support of one. You are the company you keep as they say.
I’ve done some counting anecdotal here
I’m guessing 1500 max unique posters daily and that’s generous
The conspiracy acceptance rate is an all time high which is saying something
You are why guys who dont think will always serve a purpose.
I believe you are so sorely mistaken it’s almost hilarious actually. My forum name should have been a dead give away. But I guess not. If you’re unable to land dead center having it sighted in at 200 then it’s time to find yourself another hobby. “Special Ops” has squat to do with this discussion because if “100” cannot do the same then I’d question their MOS as well. As I said, a competent hunter could land that shot every single day and twice on Sunday. It was evident he was aiming for a dome shot and one of the following happened…he didn’t slowly squeeze the trigger and allow for follow through, his breathing (the slow exhale then hold half way out) was unsteady, windage or his sighting was off. So now tell me if your “expertise” with marksmanship knowledge of the weapon in question.
I sense Sandy Hook and Pizza disappointed you. Moon landing?
We’ll find out if there’s enough of the fragmented bullet to match to the Mauser. And of course if it does match, the conspiracy believers will say it was faked.
Youre obviously a stolen valor loser because every real Marine/Infantryman and hunter knows what a 30 caliber does.
Ok champ….whatever makes you feel better.
What did 30-06 do to MLK,Jr or do you believe he wasn’t shot with 30-06 either? No exit wound with him. Bullet matched to James Earl Ray’s rifle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.