Posted on 12/03/2025 6:35:39 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
Colorado Tells DOJ ‘Take a Hike’ as It Rejects Demand for Statewide Voter Data
“We will not comply with the Trump Department of Justice’s request for Coloradans’ sensitive voting information,” Griswold said in a statement. “The DOJ can take a hike; it does not have a legal right to the information. Colorado will not help Donald Trump undermine our elections and hurt the American people.”
The U.S. Department of Justice asked Colorado to share unredacted voter information, according to Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, and the state “Will Not Comply"
(Excerpt) Read more at facebook.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Washington State is taking the same approach.
I wonder what these states are trying to hide. Actually, I am not wondering, I know that the voter rolls are padded and manipulated by the Democrats and their supporting Union organizations.
Just PROVES they do VOTE FRAUD!
Proof positive.
Good Lord! What is so sensitive about voter information?
They act like it contains passwords, credit and banking information, corporate secrets, and the Ark of the Covenant.
Why would someone be fine with the state knowing this top secret sensitive information but not the Feds? The Feds already know much more than the state.
I know the answer to these questions.
EC
“The only people that hide things are people with something to hide”
Barack Obama
Washington State, California, Colorado, really doing a lot of hiding of voter roles for federal elections……
The Constitution says states can run elections, but it doesn’t say they can run fraudulent elections via fake voters and fake voter roles. Feds have a right to check.
In the 2012 presidential election there were 10 Colorado counties that had more votes than registered voters. My county had 101% voter participation. one county, I believe it was Summit County, had 150% voter participation. How does that happen?
criminals
Tina Peters needs to be pulled out of Colorado custody
Colorado admits guilt
We have family in a little town in Colorado I won’t name although way too woke for my taste is safe and clean and as I’ve been watching for the last 6 years, is moving right.
There should be less personal information in your voter data than is in your federal tax returns. What are they hiding?
I grew up in Grand Junction. Would never, ever consider moving back to Colorado.
Approximately 1.4 million ineligible names on the Colorado voter rolls. These are dead people, imaginary people, non-citizens, and people who moved out of the State years ago.
They are also hiding systemic cheating with the vote counting machines and injection of ballot counts into the system which are not connected with any voter names.
Understood. Colorado’s voting has been aberrant, out of character for some years already.
Can we just tell Colorado that if they do not share, then we will not accept any of their votes in federal elections?
THAT would seem the BEST way to solve this...plus banning federal funding until they comply.
Oregon should be in there too.
“Approximately 1.4 million ineligible names on the Colorado voter rolls. These are dead people, imaginary people, non-citizens, and people who moved out of the State years ago.”
I was registered to vote in Arvada and voted in the 1980 election. Maybe I’m still registered to vote there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.