Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/01/2025 11:06:53 AM PST by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CondoleezzaProtege

Immune system damage from tattoo ink hasn’t been factored in the stats yet.


2 posted on 12/01/2025 11:09:30 AM PST by rfp1234 (E porcibus unum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

On the author...

“Colin Woodard is a POLITICO Magazine contributing writer and director of the Nationhood Lab at Salve Regina University’s Pell Center for International Relations and Public Policy. He is the author of six books including American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America.”

Okaaaaay...


3 posted on 12/01/2025 11:09:33 AM PST by mewzilla (Swing away, Mr. President, swing away! 🇺🇸 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

They sure got it right with yankeedom. When i lived there for a while every old person I knew was dying right at 79 years old..including my grandma.


4 posted on 12/01/2025 11:12:04 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Didn’t factor in buying more guns and ammo being tied to less money available for healthcare. Or the “Y’all, hold my beer and watch this!” factor.


6 posted on 12/01/2025 11:15:13 AM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Politico continues with the stupid and failed century old notion that socialism/progressivism/statism can make everyone’s life better, if only we centrally-plan better, and find the political enemies obstructing it

They updated the lie by adding a bit of deconstructionist white-colonial race-marxism into the mix


11 posted on 12/01/2025 11:27:57 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Obviously the lingering effects of Reconstruction and ongoing persecution by the occupying forces.

Reparations are obviously in order for multigenerational southerners. Those that can prove ancestry in the South prior to 1865 should be entitled to Yankee money.


13 posted on 12/01/2025 11:29:11 AM PST by PAR35 (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

“El Norte”?


15 posted on 12/01/2025 11:30:00 AM PST by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Sugar, white carbs, seed oils, lack of exercise. All found in great abundance in the South.

(I’ve been in Charlotte, NC for over 30 years now.)

Next question.


16 posted on 12/01/2025 11:30:01 AM PST by Eccl 10:2 (Prov 3:5 --- "Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Black population of Lexington County, SC: 15%
Black population of Placer County, CA: 2%

I have a physician friend who is from Iowa and he moved to South Carolina to a racially diverse small-sized city. He is shocked at how southern blacks do not take care of themselves. They wait until their leg needs to get amputated before coming in for medical care. Overweight, no exercise, poor diet. He advised that the difference between how poor whites in the Midwest take care of themselves is night and day compared to southern blacks. He was completely shocked by what he saw.


19 posted on 12/01/2025 11:30:55 AM PST by bort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege
The idjits at Politico desperately want to make this a "political divide". It really has very little to do with politics. 90% of it is due to:
21 posted on 12/01/2025 11:34:14 AM PST by Campion (Everything is a grace, everything is the direct effect of our Father's love - Little Flower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

The author appears to start with progressive premises, assumes some are simply fact, and then uses selective supporting data to “prove” the rest.

Much like “we all know that global warming causes an (increase/decrease) in hurricanes.” Pick your trend according to the latest weather phenomena.


26 posted on 12/01/2025 11:37:41 AM PST by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

What is the life expectancy of a neighborhood of fudge packers?

No doubt, it’s even less than a neighborhood of democrat cannibals. /spit


27 posted on 12/01/2025 11:38:05 AM PST by Flavious_Maximus (Tony Fauci will be put on death row and die of COVID!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

More liberal claptrap to make liberals feel superior. Yay, I live a few months longer than some white country grandma who raised her kids and eats pies she made herself with lard... sacrificing my whole life for a career in mid-level corporate administration was great and I can die peacefully knowing my cats will inherit my rent-controlled apartment.


32 posted on 12/01/2025 11:51:50 AM PST by cmj328 (We live here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

One of the lifespan differentiators between liberal/progressive/commies and conservatives is that the liberal/progressive/commies tend to support medical interventions that actually shorten lifespans such as euthanasia for the elderly. Their other less obvious tendencies include not prosecuting criminals increasing the chances that their residents will be killed by criminals; allowing homeless people to live outside of civilization where they can only get medical care in an emergency room which will increase the likelihood that they will die of a drug overdose or undiagnosed illness; they want people to be able to buy junk foods and sugary beverages with their public assistance funds which will lead to an increased tendency towards obesity and bad dental outcomes; opposing the use of firearms for legitimate self defense increasing the chances that people will die for lack of being able to defend themselves although this wraps into my first point about criminals.

I could go on all day about how liberal/progressive/commie policies will lead to shorter lifespans. All day.


44 posted on 12/01/2025 12:11:19 PM PST by webheart (Notice how I said all of that without any hyphens, and only complete words? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

most of the Siuth consists of transplants from the North.


58 posted on 12/01/2025 1:36:01 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

I scanned the article but saw nothing related to murder and violence of other kinds.

JD Vance in his autobiography plainly pointed out the violence found in the Appalachian community, and of course, violence and crime is notablable among blacks ( young black males, especially).

It appears that the author moves forward with the erroneous idea that all cultures are equally responsible both within white and black societies. To the author it is merely access to, and money spent on, healthcare that is the cause of the difference in life expectancy.


62 posted on 12/01/2025 4:02:34 PM PST by wintertime ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

mostly a liberal policy screed gussied up with medical statistics. Notes Wisconsin with its “Republican gerrymandered legislature” did not expand Medicaid, the action which he most focuses on as the disparity between “good policies”
deserving of praise in surrounding states and laissez-faire policies responsible for early deaths in those that did not expand. Well, since he notes the anomaly, wouldn’t the next step be to show Wisconsin outcomes inferior to the surrounding area? .... silence. I am guessing that Medicaid expansion made it available to 30% vs. 20% by expansion; to make the argument, doesn’t he have to show that the lowest quintile ( if that’s what it is) have similar outcomes in both sets of states? ( i.e. Medicaid exapanders vs. Medicaid non-expanders) but that 20< but <30 % income group where the Medicaid eligibilty should enable better medical care in expansion states is where the improvement to access is shown? The great Democrat healthcare idea is supposed to be “Medicare for all ;” Medicare is available in all states. As we have hashed and rehashed for years, Obamacare in the Zeke Emanuel intent was to keep you going until 75 and then ration you to the grave. Since he offers Mexicans as the zenith of health ( of those he mentions), wouldn’t focusing on that demo be most instructive, especially in terms of public policy, since that is the factor he sees as most critical.(Poor editing botches the point about Mexicans in terms of actual life expectancy). Lastly, the experts he quotes seem to be talking out of their hats, offering make-it -up as you go along crafted from their own stereotypes. Actually, he’s made a good argument for contrails lingering in hot humid air longer than in cooler climes.


66 posted on 12/01/2025 6:40:21 PM PST by sopo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson