Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are we dressing to the lowest common denominator?
1819 News ^ | October 8, 2025 | Annie Holmquist

Posted on 12/01/2025 6:13:57 AM PST by WhiteHatBobby0701

A while back, a married couple asked for the time of the morning service at my church, promising to show up the following Sunday. They did, and enjoyed the service, but an observation by the wife surprised me.

“Everyone’s dressed up,” was the essence of her comment. Even the ladies, she noticed, were wearing skirts and dresses instead of pants, something she seemed to think was refreshing. Apparently, I’ve been in my own church bubble for too long to realize that dressing up for special occasions and places is no longer a thing.

It’s a pity that it isn’t. Because the way we dress is really a subtle message about how we see ourselves and others.

Clothes, English philosopher Roger Scruton once said, are worn to preserve our modesty and protect our body from the elements. But that’s not the only reason we wear various bits of cloth cut in different shapes and patterns.

People live in their clothes and, therefore, see their clothes not in terms of any narrow sartorial [tailoring, style] function but in terms of the aims and accidents incidental to their lives. Their clothes come to represent them, in the sense of heralding the nature which they wish to claim as their own. [Emphasis added.]

Scruton offers the example of a denim suit of clothes, which many claim to wear because it is “functional.” Yet as Scruton explains,

The ‘functional [denim] suit’ acquires its character not because of its utility (for it is not particularly useful), nor because of its cheapness (for it is far from cheap), but because it both expresses a certain outlook and, in the course of doing so, anticipates the experience of the person who wears it.

What kind of experience and outlook does denim give the wearer? For the average American, I would guess it gives them a rugged, down-to-earth, independent feel – perhaps even a sexy persona (remember the Sydney Sweeney jeans ad that caused so much ruckus a while ago?!). This is all fine – that is, if we’re out working in the yard, riding horses on the ranch, or hiking on backwoods trails.

But what if we wear that same denim suit of clothes to a corporate job interview, church, funeral, or wedding? Do we want to walk into those situations with the carefree, simplistic attitude that denim clothes project onto the wearer and those who observe him?

Probably not … yet we do this repeatedly in our culture today.

Recall my opening story of the couple surprised by the dressed-up appearance at my church. That surprise is likely because today’s religious congregants often look like they threw on their yardwork clothes from the preceding Saturday. This appearance often extends to the preacher, who walks around the congregation wearing jeans, an untucked t-shirt, and sneakers. It continues into the workplace, where the button-down shirts, dress pants, and pencil skirts have given way to the yoga pants and sweatshirts so many got used to wearing during the pandemic, work-from-home era. And parties? Forget the days when everyone had a formal dress or suit in the back of their closet to wear to special occasions! We’re just doing well if we show up in something that looks like it’s clean and well-fitting!

“Who cares?” some may say. “I’m comfortable and I’m just blending in with the rest of society – what’s so wrong with that?”

Nothing … if we want to be consigned to being one of the faceless masses.

Sadly, that’s exactly what many want to do in our “democratic” society, a fact C. S. Lewis highlighted through the words of his demon creation “Screwtape.”

“I am credibly informed that young humans now sometimes suppress an incipient taste for classical music or good literature because it might prevent their Being Like Folks,” Screwtape says. He continues by saying “that people who would really wish to be – and are offered the Grace which would enable them to be – honest, chaste, or temperate refuse it. … They might (horror of horrors!) become individuals.”

While Screwtape uses music and books as examples, he undoubtedly could have added clothing to the mix, for do we not all continue to diminish our dress in order that we might “fit in” and not stand out from the crowd? Yet this is exactly what the forces of evil seek – to make us “equal,” and in doing so, bring us all down to the lowest common denominator, leveling our ambitions and aspirations toward goodness and successful living.

Screwtape points this out when he says the following:

What I want to fix your attention on is the vast, overall movement towards the discrediting, and finally the elimination, of every kind of human excellence – moral, cultural, social, or intellectual. And is it not pretty to notice how ‘democracy’ (in the incantatory sense) is now doing for us the work that was once done by the most ancient Dictatorships, and by the same methods? … Let no man live who is wiser or better or more famous or even handsomer than the mass. Cut them all down to a level: all slaves, all ciphers, all nobodies. All equals.

In other words, if we want to float through life as a nobody, then we should absolutely continue wearing our jeans, sweatshirts, and sneakers to all occasions – church, work, and special events.

But I suspect none of us want that “nobody” label slapped on our backs.

If that’s the case, then take the challenge. Go to church but do so in a dress or a suit. Go to work but pull that collared shirt and dress pants on before jumping into the car for the morning commute. Attend that special event, but do it dressed to the nines. None of these actions are because we’re trying to be hoity-toity; rather they stem from a desire to raise our own attitudes and radiate respect for ourselves, others, and the true, good, and beautiful things in life in the process.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: clothing; culture; dresscode; fashion; society; style

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last
To: GingisK

>> know what I mean?
Egg-zackly! 👍🏻


81 posted on 12/01/2025 10:52:47 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Hope, as a righteous product of properly aligned Faith, IS in fact a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits

82 posted on 12/01/2025 10:56:05 AM PST by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: WhiteHatBobby0701

Most people who actually attend church these days dress for whatever activity they doing directly after services. If going to the big game, they wear their team regalia.

It’s depressing.


83 posted on 12/01/2025 11:03:56 AM PST by yuleeyahoo (“Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!” - the deep-state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
On the other hand, sometimes I dress down to test hearts.

You perceive yourself as above other people with the authority to "test their hearts".

So basically you are a liberal jerk.

84 posted on 12/01/2025 11:04:26 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (It's like somebody just put the Constitution up on a wall …. and shot the First Amendment -Mike Rowe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WhiteHatBobby0701

I would assume the rich dress down (for them) so as not to appear wealthy to any potential muggers....


85 posted on 12/01/2025 11:06:56 AM PST by jeffc (Resident of the free State of Florida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
That’s the “fashion statement” that I just cannot comprehend. Worn by the affluent, it seems like a guilty apology or something.

Povertycore.

You are so rich you can afford to pay a thousand dollars for clothes that are ripped and torn.

It is mildly amusing in clothing.

86 posted on 12/01/2025 11:09:58 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (It's like somebody just put the Constitution up on a wall …. and shot the First Amendment -Mike Rowe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits
The largest falsehoods you were ever told were from a man in a suit.

Dunno ... I've heard some real whoppers from women in pantsuits. One in particular ... IYGWIM.

But the point remains. Clothes do NOT make the man. Manners might. Conduct definitely does.

To "all":

If you think dressing "well" (whatever that means) is important, then dress "well". You'll set an example. The way you conduct yourself when dressed "well" will determine what sort of example you're setting.

87 posted on 12/01/2025 11:12:18 AM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits
You know who even hired the designer Hugo Boss to make them look "better"?

The New Jersey State Police?

88 posted on 12/01/2025 11:14:17 AM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: WhiteHatBobby0701

Depending on the church you attend it’s up to you or me to set the standard. As a pastor I wear a suit and tie. There’s no dress code but the power of example is tremendous. We have new people show up and start attending and if they start changing their clothing habits I can tell God is working with them to change other aspects of their life as well.


89 posted on 12/01/2025 11:15:04 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits

Can be seen in any California super market of gas station.


90 posted on 12/01/2025 11:17:44 AM PST by Vaduz (?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY
“Don’t ever appear in my courtroom like that again!”

Hey judge! It's not your courtroom. It's OURS. It belongs to We the People who paid for it and whom you serve. Have some respect for your masters, "judge".

91 posted on 12/01/2025 11:17:51 AM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits

That reminds me of a joke I once heard, but I’ll get in trouble if I repeat it here.


92 posted on 12/01/2025 11:46:36 AM PST by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

You pay extra for clothes that are already worn out.

Brilliant!


93 posted on 12/01/2025 12:00:43 PM PST by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits

I see what you did there.


94 posted on 12/01/2025 12:10:34 PM PST by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Went to an AoG church in Spokane, half of them were wearing Seahawks jerseys. Talk about idolatry.


95 posted on 12/01/2025 12:59:26 PM PST by Mr. Blond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yuleeyahoo

The team regalia at my former church has become so bad I want to renounce my United States citizenship in order to apply for Dutch citizenship. Even caused me to ban Fox & Friends this week (one anchor and I were in school together, I was in the Arts and Sciences, the anchor was in Journalism) and must watch MSNOW Morning Joe. UGH! (One year it was so bad I became my voice teacher’s Magda Sorel from six months prior, was forced to starve on Thanksgiving, plead my case and forced to starve that I wept openly, wanting to eat but banned at the table — wanted to kill myself in the Sorel family kitchen gas oven. I ended up with a PB&J at 12:02 AM Friday and the fancy dinner we had wasn’t allowed for me.) Paid for it and not allowed to eat. Felt like Magda Sorel.

Thankful that church has been always wear a jacket and tie. ALWAYS. I’d rather have Ailes Era Fox & Friends for the dress code in church. You have to be dressed if you are attending the early service, especially with the Governor or my Representative in church (I often speak to my Congressman in church). I was run off the local church and drive an hour away because of the “Felkel Incident” when an extended family member questioned sotierological changes (Baptist church going more Methodist, and now they use liberal Baptist material for their choral and youth music ministries, but their services are led by singing Steven Furtick and Bill Johnson every Sunday).

At that church locally, nobody cared to wear jackets because they wanted to hear their band perform hits.


96 posted on 12/01/2025 1:03:30 PM PST by WhiteHatBobby0701
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson