Posted on 11/27/2025 4:29:09 PM PST by Cincinnatus.45-70
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
§2383. Rebellion or insurrection
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section2383&num=0&edition=prelim
This was posted by Freeper Uncle Lonny
Oath of Enlistment
I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;
and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God. (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).
“THey are SKEERED of what’s about to happen.”
I doubt that. When was the last time anyone on the left faced consequences for any wrongdoing? The Seditious Six know that, and they ain’t in no ways skeered.
Bingo!
Demons doin' all the shootn' figuratively and literally.
I think it was meant for all of their crazed followers, whether in or out of the military. Somebody, somewhere would lose a few screws over it and go bezerk.
And they can find some piss-ant District Judge to back up the “illegal order” BS.
Does it matter? The right has zero plans to meet the threat. No steet action to fight the goons head on. No congressional action to counter the mutiny. No coordinated funding to counter the Fabians spending. We may as well do a howl to the sky like the useful idiots. We have become effete. Full of excuses, apologies and ferocious at fighting one another.
Mind control bull $hit
I disagree slightly with you. Please allow me to explain my thoughts.
1. Why make a video , expensive to do so and from a DNC that just had to take out millions in a loan to stay afloat, and NOT be able to cite one illegal order?
The obvious is to incite rebellion in the military. Overthrow the Administration.
These people, the left democrats, have lost at the ballot box. Their cheating at elections is finally being countered. They lost the narrative. Their cushion of voter support in the form of those here illegally, are being deported. Their media no longer carries the same weight with the public. They can only slow Trump down with their corrupt judges, not stop him.
Violence is the lefts only remaining option. Collateral damage coming from illegals in the form of homicide, A bonus.
Mark Kelly and his buddies knew exactly what they were doing, and they deserve either life in prison or the death penalty for it.
As for the good guys, you had better wise up double quick. The GOP needs a war time Attorney General and the voters need to rid their party from the disease of RINOS. Otherwise, the left will increase the violence till they get Civil War in the streets. Trump can do a lot but he can’t do everything.
Thanks for the thoughtful discussion.i don’t think we disagree much at all.
Oh, he meant it.
Actually it was a two part message.
Kelly said the first part. He encouraged dissent in the ranks by saying following illegal orders would be punished.
Then, the other arizona senator, Ruben Gallego, says that once Trump is gone, the democrats will, decide what was an illegal order.
This is intimidation in two steps...
It seems the Democrat Party may not have paid for the video:
Consider the actual transcript of the video where the call to ignore orders was given.
EN. MARK KELLY (D-AZ): You can refuse illegal orders.SEN. ELISSA SLOTKIN (D-MI): You can refuse illegal orders.
REP. CHRIS DELUZIO (D-PA): You must refuse illegal orders.
They are playing on the repetition of the message, but the third message, delivered in larger block letters changes the word "can" to "must," in larger type with the word "must" emphasized.
If there is any defense to be made, it's that Kelly (who said "can" instead of "must") can say that he made the video but didn't know how it was going to be edited. On the other hand, it can be argued that Kelly could have objected to the release of the video if he disagreed with the editing, but he didn't.
-PJ
This will explain:
https://rumble.com/v4ict2i-q-the-plan-to-save-the-world-all-parts-1-6-joe-m-storm-is-upon-us.html
They intended to imply that Trump IS issuing illegal orders, and therefore should be removed from office. That is sedition.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.