Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Experts Say Democratic Video Not ‘Seditious,’ as Trump Claims
FactCheck.org® A Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center ^ | 11/24/25 | D'Angelo Gore

Posted on 11/26/2025 10:09:26 AM PST by DallasBiff

click here to read article


Message from Jim Robinson:

Dear FRiends,

We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.

If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you,

Jim


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: odawg

They were clever all they did was state the code.


41 posted on 11/26/2025 10:58:04 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: All

“Experts say”.......................rotflol.


42 posted on 11/26/2025 10:58:06 AM PST by Liz ("Socialism is a wonderful idea. It's just that it's been disastrous." Thomas Sowell. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Skywise
I suggest you look up 18 U.S.C. § 2387 -

(a)Whoever, with intent to interfere with, impair, or influence the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the military or naval forces of the United States:
(1)advises, counsels, urges, or in any manner causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States; or
(2)distributes or attempts to distribute any written or printed matter which advises, counsels, or urges insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States— Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
(b)For the purposes of this section, the term “military or naval forces of the United States” includes the Army of the United States, the Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, and Coast Guard Reserve of the United States; and, when any merchant vessel is commissioned in the Navy or is in the service of the Army or the Navy, includes the master, officers, and crew of such vessel.
43 posted on 11/26/2025 10:59:34 AM PST by brent13a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

I think the six lawmakers in question violated their oaths of office. That alone is pretty bad, don’t you think?


44 posted on 11/26/2025 11:11:42 AM PST by Migraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Getready

Suborning mutiny


45 posted on 11/26/2025 11:14:36 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (The Democrats' official policy is now, “Hate, Violence and Murder". Change my mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Those “experts” they are always saying things.


46 posted on 11/26/2025 11:15:56 AM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

It appears to overthrow the government with force or violence is the democrats objective by their actions.

Media approved


47 posted on 11/26/2025 11:17:24 AM PST by Vaduz (?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

I noticed when this video was released that the language was carefully chosen to be factually correct, yet when taken in context with the people who released it, their positions of authority, and their motives, it clearly demonstrates an attempt to negatively influence morale and/or incite insubordination within the U.S. armed forces. That part is plain as day, and a jury would probably agree.


48 posted on 11/26/2025 11:27:56 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

These Democrat Senators are making a desperate attempt to distract from Trump’s successes. They are not interested in going the extra mile, to provide solutions for real problems.


49 posted on 11/26/2025 11:33:58 AM PST by FreedBird (p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

“Experts Say”……..A phrase that’s become laughable.


50 posted on 11/26/2025 11:36:56 AM PST by clintonh8r (The truth is hate speech to those who hate the truth. ©️)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

I have viewed said video I am a Vietnam/Cold War veteran
Said esteemed determiner can go to Hades. I’ll provide the coin.

Those federal legislators, in my view and according to the U.C.M.J., did by selective paraphrasing said codex, perform seditious deeds.
I urge all my brothers and sisters ‘of the fatigue cloth’, to ignore these plebes’ cackling, and perform your assigned duties as so ordered.


51 posted on 11/26/2025 11:37:58 AM PST by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff
while not (capital S) Sedition, it is seditious behavior specifically designed to incite their (less intelligent) adherents to cause chaos, bloodshed, and bad press for both the unfortunate adherents in the military and Trump.

They attempted to sacrifice their fellow party members for their own political gain.
This is how the left has always operated.
52 posted on 11/26/2025 11:40:41 AM PST by wafflehouse ("there was a third possibility that we hadn't even counted upon" -Alice's Restaurant Massacree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

NOT SEDITIOUS?

NO BUT INSULTING!
AND
THAT IS WORSE.

Every person whomever was sworn in to Service should be FURIOUS!


53 posted on 11/26/2025 11:42:05 AM PST by BatGuano (Donald J. Trump, thank you!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

54 posted on 11/26/2025 11:43:14 AM PST by for-q-clinton (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

55 posted on 11/26/2025 11:55:25 AM PST by Tench_Coxe (The woke were surprised by the reaction to the Bud Light fiasco. May there be many more surprises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owen

“Restating that training is not sedition.”

IMO it would be subjective...the manner in which it was said, the reason, the target.

Search Assist
Synonyms for “subjective” include personal, biased, individual, and emotional. These words relate to perspectives or opinions that are influenced by personal feelings rather than objective facts.


56 posted on 11/26/2025 11:57:32 AM PST by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Thommas

True, “zero credibility.”
I would reply to the, “experts say,” person,”What experts?, You and that dead rat in your pocket?”
(that worked in elementary school)


57 posted on 11/26/2025 11:59:55 AM PST by BatGuano (Donald J. Trump, thank you!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Liberal “experts” of course.


58 posted on 11/26/2025 12:00:33 PM PST by evangmlw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

BS. These insurrectionists are TELLING service member WHAT behaviors they THINK are unlawful, behaviors that they don’t agree with.


59 posted on 11/26/2025 12:01:01 PM PST by fwdude (Why is there a "far/radical right," but damned if they'll admit that there is a far/radical left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

You can say whatever you want, but I call it treason.


60 posted on 11/26/2025 12:06:13 PM PST by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson