You shouldn’t restrict people’s free speech even if you disagree with it but also you should import Muslims into your White country.
Correct—the folks worried about anti-semitism failed to notice the elephant in the room.
Muslim immigration.
Were they just stupid as rocks?
“You shouldn’t restrict people’s free speech even if you disagree with it but also you should import Muslims into your White country.”
Think you missed a “not” in your second clause, but I know what you meant.
A similar quandary exists with Islam and freedom of religion. I am very much for freedom of religion, except that Islam has proven itself incompatible with Western Civilization.
And for clarity, Islam is not a “relgion” as defined by the SCOTUS in United States v. Ballard or Torcaso v. Watkins.
Religion, as defined legally, emphasize sincere beliefs about ultimate concerns or a higher power, but excludes systems that are predominantly secular, political, or aimed at subverting civil authority.
Islam’s core tenets integrate religious doctrine with mandatory political, legal, social, and military obligations that demand the establishment of a global caliphate—a theocratic state where non-Muslims are subjugated or eliminated. This makes Islam akin to a geopolitical movement bent on conquest and imposition of supremacy, not a protected faith.
Unlike Christianity or Judaism, which are seen as adaptable to separation of church and state, Islam is inherently incompatible with the U.S. Constitution because it views itself as the supreme law, regulating all aspects of life and rejecting secular authority.
This renders it a “dangerous political ideology” masquerading as religion, similar to how courts have denied protections to groups like the KKK when their activities cross into sedition or violence.
Legally, if Islam is reclassified as non-religious, it loses safeguards under the Free Exercise Clause, Establishment Clause, Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), and Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). Government could then ban mosques, restrict Muslim immigration, or prohibit Sharia-influenced practices without constitutional violation.