Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

-

Too bad covid shot studies were banned during the epidemic......who know, it might have actually saved a few lives.

-

1 posted on 11/20/2025 9:14:08 AM PST by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: V_TWIN
Added Siegel, "It is also quite possible that the studies were biased if those who took the vaccine were already more prone to other infections or to kidney problems."

In other words, those who are older and less healthy were more likely to get the Covid vaccine. Therefore, they would have been more likely to have issues whether they had gotten the vaccine or not.

I think that, with the diminishing virulence of succeeding variations of the Covid virus, each person can legitimately choose whether or not to get the shot or not. Early in the epidemic, Covid was more deadly and many people died (including friends of mine). Today it is different. If you choose to get the shot, I would recommend the Novavax vaccine, which is a more traditional vaccine, rather than the MRNA shots. It is slightly more difficult to find, but it is around. Those who are older might want to consider it, more so than the younger folks. Just my two cents.

2 posted on 11/20/2025 9:24:38 AM PST by Engraved-on-His-hands (If someone says that there are no absolutes, ask them if they are absolutely sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: V_TWIN

I wonder if we’ll ever know if more were killed by the “vaccine” than Covid…


3 posted on 11/20/2025 9:25:33 AM PST by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: V_TWIN

“Possible health risks“ my butt.


4 posted on 11/20/2025 9:32:54 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: V_TWIN

World’s greatest psych op shot. Not a vaccine.


5 posted on 11/20/2025 9:37:20 AM PST by GrumpyOldGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: V_TWIN

Siegel is pro-covid vaccine, and has been all along. For that reason, I have less respect for him.


6 posted on 11/20/2025 9:40:08 AM PST by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: V_TWIN
The article fails to distinguish between mRNA and non-mRNA Covid vaccines. The latter is a vaccine based on traditional non-mRNA design. I.e., COVID-19 vaccines recommended for use in the United States for the 2025–2026 vaccination season include both mRNA and protein subunit (non-mRNA) types. The mRNA vaccines available are from Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech, while Novavax offers a protein subunit vaccine.

I'm guessing that the vaccine that was tested and found a problem was the mRNA version(s).

7 posted on 11/20/2025 9:42:04 AM PST by JesusIsLord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: V_TWIN

Its not a vaccine its a death delivery system.


9 posted on 11/20/2025 9:46:55 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: V_TWIN
...under new scrutiny after studies reveal possible health risks




10 posted on 11/20/2025 10:00:26 AM PST by Tommy Revolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: V_TWIN

Duh. That is why many of us refused the clot shot.


15 posted on 11/20/2025 10:28:55 AM PST by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and don't wish to smile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: V_TWIN

These studies started showing up in 2021.


16 posted on 11/20/2025 10:29:49 AM PST by mewzilla (Swing away, Mr. President, swing away! 🇺🇸 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson