Replies

Added Siegel, "It is also quite possible that the studies were biased if those who took the vaccine were already more prone to other infections or to kidney problems."

In other words, those who are older and less healthy were more likely to get the Covid vaccine. Therefore, they would have been more likely to have issues whether they had gotten the vaccine or not.

I think that, with the diminishing virulence of succeeding variations of the Covid virus, each person can legitimately choose whether or not to get the shot or not. Early in the epidemic, Covid was more deadly and many people died (including friends of mine). Today it is different. If you choose to get the shot, I would recommend the Novavax vaccine, which is a more traditional vaccine, rather than the MRNA shots. It is slightly more difficult to find, but it is around. Those who are older might want to consider it, more so than the younger folks. Just my two cents.

I would recommend the Novavax vaccine, which is a more traditional vaccine, rather than the MRNA shots.

Novavax is better in that it doesn't hijack your body to make the spikes, it is still full of the spike proteins (not full, inactive, CoViD cells), trade secret toxic substances, as well as not vury pure, leaving large chunks of the insect cells used to grow the spike proteins.

Yea, it might be/likely is safer than the mRNA shots, it also hasn't been studied nearly enough to actually know how good/bad it is for you.

I would recommend the Novavax vaccine...

In good conscience, I would never recommend any vaccine.

These korporations and their government cohorts have repeatedly shown they can't be trusted, and are granted legal immunity, further dispelling any trust one might be conditioned to grant them.