Posted on 11/20/2025 5:14:10 AM PST by V_TWIN
President Trump has signed the Epstein Files Transparency act into law to release all files related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.
As The Gateway Pundit reported, the House overwhelmingly voted for the bill, with only one Republican defector, Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA), voting against the bill, citing privacy concerns for victims of Epstein.
The Senate later approved the bill by unanimous consent.
The President called on Congress to pass the bill on Tuesday, stating, “We have nothing to hide, and it’s time to move on from this Democrat Hoax perpetrated by Radical Left Lunatics in order to deflect from the Great Success of the Republican Party, including our recent Victory on the Democrat ‘Shutdown.’”
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
what is your source that Epstein asked every girl if she was 18?
And what is your excuse for why they worried there was child porn materials that they would have to review:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.591653/gov.uscourts.nysd.591653.100.0.pdf
“On March 14, 2023, counsel for the Epstein Estate notified counsel for Jane Doe 1 that it
had located materials within the Epstein Media that may be responsive to her subpoenas. The
Estate also advised counsel for the Government and Jane Doe 1 of its concern that some of the
Epstein Media might contain child sex abuse imagery (CSAM2
). The knowing accessing,
possession, or distribution of CSAM is forbidden by federal law. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252, 2252A.
The Estate has expressed concern that its counsel’s review of the Epstein Media could subject
counsel to criminal investigation or charges or civil claims in light of the possibility that the review of the Epstein Media could involve accessing CSAM. The Epstein Estate has advised that it does
not have any specific knowledge that any of the Epstein Media does, in fact, contain CSAM, but
wishes to put in place an appropriate procedure in case its counsel encounters such material.
Tell me how you imagine the conversation went when the purpose was to get her to change her mind.
And Trump actually wasnt there.
Congress is pressured all the time to change votes from Presidents, staff, other members of Congress, and their leaders,lobbyists, public, etc.
Yet, you keep saying Boebert said there was NO PRESSURE to get her to change her mind when only ONE person had to change it and they wouldnt have the necessary signatures.
I don’t believe her. And she is sending a mixed message by highlighting someone who was praising her for standing strong against the pressure
but yeah..go ahead and continue to think whatever you want
What polling? Post them.
Were you in the situation room? If not stop imagining and accept what Boebert said; “no pressure”. What is so hard about that?
I am not going to accept it. I don’t believe her. And I think it was pretty crappy of her to say she would only sign it if she didnt have to stand in line.
that is truly a WTF? moment. She is only principled if she doesn’t have to stand in line???????????????
What new legislation would improve the future that does not alreeady exist? Should that legislation be at the state or federal level?
Or is this solely to titillate us?
Yeah yeah, like Trump being a Russian spy....You bet.
I’m thankful Trump does’nt use questionable polling numbers to set policy. Maybe, just maybe Trump is actually trying to save the this young great country and build foundations for its future?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.