1 posted on
11/19/2025 3:01:35 PM PST by
Ezekiel
To: Ezekiel
3I/Atlas didn’t kill itself.
2 posted on
11/19/2025 3:03:21 PM PST by
RckyRaCoCo
(there are demons out there, and they look like people)
To: Ezekiel
I stopped watching a couple on minutes in when the NASA talking head started going on how they couldn’t talk about this info before because of the shutdown.
3 posted on
11/19/2025 3:06:47 PM PST by
mewzilla
(Swing away, Mr. President, swing away! ๐บ๐ธ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ )
To: telescope115
Where you able to watch?
I forgot about it, was busy with Christmas lights and stuff.
4 posted on
11/19/2025 3:07:01 PM PST by
Ezekiel
(๐๏ธ "Come fly with US". ๐ด Ingenuity -- because the Son of David begins with MARS โ๏ธ, aka every man)
To: Ezekiel
Comets are fuzzy, people. Thatโs all 31 Atlas is, an interstellar comet. And NASA isnโt even paying me to say this.
To: SunkenCiv; Red Badger
Entertainment ping.
'NASA= NEVER A STRAIGHT ANSWER,' an X user posted during the press event.
๐
6 posted on
11/19/2025 3:11:23 PM PST by
Ezekiel
(๐๏ธ "Come fly with US". ๐ด Ingenuity -- because the Son of David begins with MARS โ๏ธ, aka every man)
To: Ezekiel
7 posted on
11/19/2025 3:11:45 PM PST by
Fledermaus
("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
To: Ezekiel
1.) It’s a rock.
2.) We have far better surveillance of space than we ever did before.
3.) These things will be routine and boring in 10 years.
4.) At any time one should expect about 10 interstellar objects larger than a meter inside the orbit of Neptune if neighboring stars shed debris at the same rate as our solar system. They are just the dust being gravitationally scattered off other solar systems’ equivalent of the Ort Cloud.
To: Ezekiel
What’s the big deal? If it isn’t a comet, then all that’s left to do is BOHICA
9 posted on
11/19/2025 3:28:08 PM PST by
NonValueAdded
(First, I was a clinger, then deplorable, now I'm garbage. Feel the love? )
To: All
12 posted on
11/19/2025 3:48:09 PM PST by
SteveH
To: Ezekiel
I saw some of this earlier. I was disappointed. It seems that NASA has not learned much of anything new.
13 posted on
11/19/2025 3:49:22 PM PST by
Revel
To: Ezekiel
The article is silly nonsense.
16 posted on
11/19/2025 4:18:14 PM PST by
Williams
(Thank God for the election of President Trump!)
To: Ezekiel
Your ride awaits you... But before you go make sure to remove your genitals... You will not be needing them where you're going to. Just ask Do(h)... He'll be waiting there for you.
20 posted on
11/19/2025 4:59:14 PM PST by
jerod
(Nazis were essentially Socialist in Hugo Boss uniforms... Get over it!)
To: Ezekiel
However, the pictures, taken on a rather sophisticated camera on Mars, were largely blurry and showed only a distant dot. Which is consistent with AABt (Advanced Alien Blurring Technology) mentioned before (not that this "visitor" was intelligent aliens).
21 posted on
11/19/2025 5:19:13 PM PST by
daniel1212
(Turn 2 the Lord Jesus who saves damned+destitute sinners on His acct, believe, b baptized+follow HIM)
To: Ezekiel
Its a comet is all, big deal
23 posted on
11/19/2025 6:24:10 PM PST by
markman46
(engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
To: Ezekiel
The telescope in Mars orbit was designed to photograph the surface of Mars. It was not designed for watching comets. Because the comet orbit took it behind the Sun that was the best that could be done .
26 posted on
11/19/2025 7:19:41 PM PST by
Nateman
(Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
To: Ezekiel
IOW, it's a natural object, NASA isn't hiding anything, and what our society needs right now is another Heaven's Gate cult.
27 posted on
11/19/2025 9:04:51 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(NeverTrumpin' -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson