The Blue-Green Axis: Much More than a Dalliance

American Thinker ^ | 19 Nov, 2025 | Todd and Erik Gregory

[MtnClimber]

The progressive and Islamist movements, both global in scope, have far more in common than meets the eye.

As New York City celebrates a socialist-Islamist mayor and we approach the tenth anniversary of the ISIS-inspired terrorist attack in San Bernardino, it is worth reflecting on the many commonalities that unite the Blue-Green (Democrat-Islamist) alliance.

Many have remarked on the absurdities of these misfit ideologies as bedfellows. LGBTQ often professes love for Hamas irrespective of the latter’s nonnegotiable religious injunction to sentence gays to death.

Feminists who rage against the so-called white western patriarchy offer unconditional support for an unyielding theocratic movement that would institute shariah law, subjugating females as the dhimmified chattel of Muslim men.

Bitter and ofttimes non-telegenic progressive women (AWFLs) are indifferent to the industrial scale rape and sex trafficking of native European girls by male Muslim migrants, perhaps even gratified that tens of thousands of innocent working-class girls are physically and emotionally maimed for life provided it contributes to burning down “the system” or “the West” and furthers the progressive cause.

Still, despite the glaringly inescapable contradictions, birds of a feather flock together. And upon closer examination, the progressive and Islamist movements, both global in scope, have far more in common than meets the eye. Here are ten key ways in which the two totalitarian movements are conjoined at the hip in their marriage of convenience.

Often willing to kill and die for The Cause. Both ideologies are obsessed with destroying their perceived enemies. What do James Hodgkinson, Thomas Crooks, Luigi Mangione, and Tyler Robinson have in common with Mohamed Atta, Nidal Hasan, Omar Mateen, and San Bernardino’s Tashfeen Malik? All were willing to kill and/or die for The Cause. All were obsessed with politics and tribal identity. None were schizophrenic or conventionally crazy.

---

TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: ecoterrorism; ecoterrorists; globalwarminghoax; greennewdeal; islam; marxism; unitednations; untiednations

[MtnClimber]

Both are totalitarian and promote evil.

[Uncle Miltie]

Watermelons.

Green on the outside, red on the inside.

Islamist green, communist red.

[ckilmer]

Both want the death of western civilization

[Tell It Right]

What hit me from the article, that the article writes as though it's an afterthought, but to me is perhaps the most important reason for the cooperation between leftism and Islam:

As a bonus, both are really, really united in hatred for Jews and Christians

[metmom]

Often willing to kill and die for The Cause. Both ideologies are obsessed with destroying their perceived enemies. What do James Hodgkinson, Thomas Crooks, Luigi Mangione, and Tyler Robinson have in common with Mohamed Atta, Nidal Hasan, Omar Mateen, and San Bernardino’s Tashfeen Malik? All were willing to kill and/or die for The Cause.

Then there should be no problem accommodating them.

[webheart]

One of the cleverest things the progressive media has done is to take the color blue as their own. It was always communists who were identified with red: Red China, better dead than red, Red Square. They stole blue and assigned red to conservatives and conservatives didn’t fight back so now we are red.

[Robert A Cook PE]

Well written, well thought out.

[mad_as_he$$]

...

[ByteMercenary]

Remember that the faint, thin line that is the philosophical difference between the koranimals and the far left is the willingness to murder the non-believer. That line grows more faint as the days pass ...

[xp38]

They weren’t set prior to the 2000 election but after it was red for the pubs and blue for the dims. It wasn’t a hard and fast rule but IIRC some of the networks used blue for the incumbent party and red for the challenging party on electoral maps. That was how it was for 2000 but for some reason maybe because that election was so contentious the colours became permanent.