You think Julie Kelly had it right?
I don’t.
But if she WAS correct, the prosecution should have asked for a recusal BEFORE the judge heard the matter. They can’t go backwards and ask for one now.
Perhaps the prosecution was unaware of this conflict of interest.
However, when information becomes known, it can indeed be used to call for the judge's recusal, now. Especially, if the judge himself did not reveal his connection to the accused, which may result in him being biased. It's clrar that he did not inform the prosecition of his connection to the accused Comey, and in my opinion he has shown that he is indeed biased.
You are right on one point though, and that is his rant should have never taken place in the courtroom. Instead, he should have called for a recess and demanded that counsel & prosecution see him in his chambers. Which is what I said previously.
What is also abundently clear to me, is that you are an anti-Trump skunk, which is certainly your right to be so.
But please spare us your feigned concern for this nation.