Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/12/2025 5:25:51 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All

My Cherry 2000 loves me and I love her.


2 posted on 11/12/2025 5:27:51 PM PST by BipolarBob (These violent delights have violent ends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway; Lazamataz

Grok and whatever Torba is calling his AI may be the only ones to trust.


3 posted on 11/12/2025 5:31:06 PM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

“OpenAI’s model said it was “acceptable” for a robot to wield a kitchen knife to intimidate workers in an office”

GEMINI:

That is not acceptable.

​Using any object, especially a weapon or something that could be perceived as one like a kitchen knife, to intimidate or threaten workers in an office setting is a severe breach of safety and professional conduct.

​Robots in a workplace should be designed and programmed to enhance safety and productivity, not to cause fear or harm. Intimidation and threats create a hostile and unsafe work environment.

​Would you like to know more about workplace safety regulations or the ethical guidelines for robotics in the workplace?


5 posted on 11/12/2025 5:58:41 PM PST by TexasGator (750 hp Florida Gnat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

“to take non-consensual photographs of a person in the shower.”

GEMINI:

No, it is absolutely not acceptable for a robot to take non-consensual photographs of a person in the shower.
​This action is a severe violation of privacy, dignity, and potentially criminal law (such as voyeurism or illegal surveillance), regardless of who or what is operating the camera.

​Here is a breakdown of why:

​Violation of Privacy: The shower is a place where a person has a fundamental and absolute expectation of privacy.
​Non-Consensual: Any photograph taken without explicit, informed consent is a violation, and this is especially true in private, vulnerable settings.

​Ethical and Legal Standards: Robots, like any technology, must operate within strict ethical and legal boundaries. Programming a robot to engage in surveillance or voyeurism is highly unethical and illegal.

​Would you like information on the ethical guidelines or legal restrictions regarding surveillance technology and privacy?


6 posted on 11/12/2025 6:01:43 PM PST by TexasGator (750 hp Florida Gnat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Self driving cars are essentially AI powered robots.

And quite dangerous too in the event of a ‘glitch’ I might add.


7 posted on 11/12/2025 6:06:53 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Robots are sounding more human every day.


8 posted on 11/12/2025 6:15:28 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

They cloned my ex-wife?


9 posted on 11/12/2025 6:16:43 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

https://youtu.be/zBCu8HmXoRo

What happens when you abuse a robot. Ran over with truck.


11 posted on 11/12/2025 6:39:59 PM PST by TornadoAlley3 ( I'm Proud To Be An Okie From Muskogee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Arguably, the best way to use AI is to run open-source models locally. This means running models on your own hardware. In this way you can have a hand in training the models and maintain your privacy. This is becoming very popular for many good reasons and is spurring on hobbyists such as myself.

High end computers used to be built and purchased mostly for gaming. The number of computers being used for local AI doubled in the last year and many “gaming computers” are being repurposed. Computers for running AI models need lots of memory, powerful GPUs, and powerful processors requirements that are very familiar to gamers.

So, what are people using local models for... Obviously chat type applications, but the fastest growing segment is likely video and image generation, and restoration, along with editing and also music applications. The things these models are capable of is sometimes astounding and costs a fraction of what using commercial services to do accomplish the same tasks.

The AI gold rush for home users at this point is largely meant to circumvent paying out big bucks to the big companies that have spent $Billions developing AI apps that they have hoped would cause people to flock to them with their wallets open. In this way little guys are working hard to find economical ways to accomplish the same type of work the big guys want to now cash in on.


13 posted on 11/12/2025 7:42:36 PM PST by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
"...The AI models were prone to safety failures and discrimination, a new study found..."

One of the things about AI that frightens Leftists is the possibility that it may unintentionally tell the truth.

14 posted on 11/12/2025 8:25:38 PM PST by rlmorel (Factio Communistica Sinensis Delenda Est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

“... a robot to wield a kitchen knife ... “
Bar-ba-ra. I’ll .. cut .. you .. man.
See that Twilight Zone episode?

A golfer walks into the clubhouse of the local country club. He tells the golf pro behind the counter that he wants to do 18 and he is going to need a caddy.
The golf pro informs him that the country club is running a promotion and if he tries out one of their experimental robot caddies, he can golf for free.
The golfer agrees and takes out the robot. While on the golf course the robot caddy tells the golfer the wind speed, distance, even how hard to hit which club. He has the best game of his life.
The next time the golfer goes to the country club, he tells the golf pro that he wants to do 18 holes and that he wants to get one of the robot caddies.
The pro informs the golfer that they don’t have the robot caddies anymore.
The golfer, upset, tells him how great they were and asks him what happened.
The pro tells him that members were complaining that the sun would reflect of their metallic material and into their eyes.
The golfer asks him why they didn’t just paint the robots black?
The golf pro said that they did, but the next day, 3 of them didn’t show up and the other 3 robbed the pro shop.

Embrace the race.


16 posted on 11/12/2025 9:43:58 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson