All Loeb did was propose a scale to judge what an object that displays major anomalies could be. 0 is rock, 10 is a spaceship. Because of all the major anomalies he scored it a 4. And said more data will move it up or down on that scale.
Yet everyone seems to go nuts when someone mentions there is a faint possibility it could be a technological object. Without bothering to check to see what the actual data really is.
It is not a comet, as comets are currently defined. It could be an asteroid as some observations postulate. But the truth is no one actually knows what it is or is not.
The Non-Gravitational Acceleration of 3I is greater than that observed with Oumuamua about which there was never a solution observed. Previous comets that close to the Sun and closer only showed a NGA of 1-10% of which 3I is showing.
Explain all 3I anomalies in a scientific manner please.
It’s a dirty snowball with a rock inside...............