Posted on 10/31/2025 7:08:30 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The AWS crash was a warning shot: our hyperconnected world runs on fragile code, overworked defenders, and blind trust—and one real cyberattack could bring it all down.
We are just concluding Cybersecurity Awareness Month, though this year’s reminder felt more like a warning flare than a celebration. The message is clear, however. Our digital infrastructure is hanging by a thread, and we just got a glimpse of how thin that thread really is.
Just weeks ago, the world’s largest cloud provider, Amazon Web Services, suffered a massive outage that paralyzed everything from retail transactions to smart-home devices. The failure was traced to a bug in AWS’s internal DNS automation system—no hackers, no malware, just an innocent software mistake. Yet the ripple effects were staggering: global websites went dark, banks struggled to process payments, and thousands of businesses suddenly remembered just how fragile the cloud can be.
Now imagine if it hadn’t been an accident. Imagine if the outage were the result of a deliberate, coordinated cyberattack—one designed to sow chaos, stall commerce, and cripple confidence in the world’s most trusted digital platforms. The truth is, what we saw from AWS was not just a glitch; it was a rehearsal for what a large-scale cyber strike could look like. And if that ever happens, it won’t just inconvenience us—it will stop the modern world cold.
Our digital dependence is the problem. The same efficiency that made cloud computing irresistible has concentrated global data and workloads into a handful of providers. When one region or automation system hiccups, it sends a shockwave through logistics, healthcare, banking, and national infrastructure. We’ve built a skyscraper of convenience on the foundation of a single cable, and the AWS outage proved that one frayed wire can darken the skyline.
But even...
(Excerpt) Read more at amgreatness.com ...
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
The minute your data leaves your premises, it’s not your data anymore.
It’s astonishing that there doesn’t seem to be a sense of urgency regarding this issue.
“It’s astonishing that there doesn’t seem to be a sense of urgency regarding this issue.”
Sadly, you are right. Once a company gets bit and loses money they get riled up to do something, but that is short lived. Proper cyber security is not expensive compared to overall costs, but it does add noticeable costs.
This outage, as well as the subsequent outage with Azure, had nothing to do with where your data lives. This could happen on your own home network as well.
DNS is basically an Internet phone book. Everything on the Internet runs using IP addresses. IP addresses are numerical and not exactly easy to remember for a large number of endpoints, so it’s not like when you were a kid and could remember your home phone number and the numbers of all of your friends. These are longer numbers and due to the sheer number of them (over 4B possible IPv4 addresses alone), a canonical system for organization makes more sense, hence DNS.
DNS works great... until it doesn’t. Over the years we’ve bolted on functionality for DNS such as more recent DNS-over-HTTPS and DNSSEC. As DNS becomes more complex, and the interoperability (recursion) of DNS systems grows, one small blip in the chain causes a massive outage downstream, and we get what we had with AWS and Azure.
The biggest problem, IMO, is that those of us who know DNS very deep and can unravel the Gordian knot it’s become are getting older, and the very fundamental functionality of the Internet as we know is becoming more anachronistic and is less of a concern or point of understanding for upcoming IT engineers. Modern communication and systems engineers aren’t taught the fundamentals in lieu of learning things like nebulous “cloud” technologies. As a result, one small change to a high level system has downstream impacts that even the most ardent UA tester can’t foresee. As those of us who’ve been doing this work for 30+ years start to eye retirement, the next generation is wholly unprepared for comprehending what was left behind, because, well, let’s face it: we were really bad about documenting it.
The Internet is going to become something akin to the Apollo program but much more impactful. All of the brains behind the origins will die off leaving a system where none of the new blood understand how the subordinate components work, and when something big breaks, we’ll likely see a massive outage that may never fully resolve.
Bfl
I’m thinking there may be a glitch in using a combination of IPv4 and IPv6 - which was instituted because, with almost every electronic device in the world having its own IP address these days, we were running out of them under IPv4.
I noticed a couple glitches in Amazon orders I made during the “glitch”. Got one item wrong (ordered Magnesium and got Magnesium Oxide) and a couple were delayed and had several updated delivery dates as they got a handle on it.
Late in my career, I became a big fan of the Cradlepoint ecosystem. Their software and devices made it easy to route around most of the common DNS fuckery one would encounter. It did assume that one knew what they were doing. As was too often not the case. IT certs and college classes don't necessarily grant one an intuitive grasp of DNS and IP routing and hardware ecosystems with all of their peculiarities.
I've had to deal with higher-ups who went all ooooh, let's move everything to the cloud. I always had to bring the discussion back to the concept of business continuity. And the question was: how long can you operate the business without cloud connectivity? The same question applied to other critical path systems like servers and firewalls. I was always careful to document the responses to these questions, as I'm sure you can imagine why.
I really don’t understand why some many companies outsource their cloed/internal systems. It seems like a massive security risk to not host your own systems, especially for big defense companies and similar that can easily afford to do so.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.