Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/31/2025 9:56:13 AM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Morgana

Rights in California? You ain’t got no stinkn rights, only what the state says.


2 posted on 10/31/2025 9:58:13 AM PDT by DownInFlames (P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Intimidation and unconstitutional.........SUE TEH BASTARDS!..............


3 posted on 10/31/2025 9:58:56 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

THE MOST fundamental tenant of progressive democrats is killing babies. If Trump were going to send in the National Guard to protect killing babies the democrats would demand the full force of every branch brought in to keep the slaughter going.


4 posted on 10/31/2025 10:17:02 AM PDT by Organic Panic ('Was I molested. I think so' - Ashley Biden in response to her father joining her in the shower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

If the photographer was on public property there’s a winnable lawsuit there.


5 posted on 10/31/2025 10:26:52 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Annnd....TRUMP IS RIGHT AGAIN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Somehow this incident went from the cops asking the photographer to discontinue filming and his ignoring it, to being detained in a cop car because he would not make his ID available in front of a hot spot like an abortion clinic. He could easily have said the ID was in the car and apparently didn’t.

He was not arrested as he was released at the point and was only issued a citation to appear in court at a later date. So, he didn’t provide ID, he was in a hot spot at an abortion clinic and was asked by the people in the clinic to stop, and this incident was part of a larger controversy involving undercover videos, which also prompted investigations by Congress and other authorities.

He walked into it and failed to assist LE in taking care of it. For FACE purposes, a definition which has been adopted by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in Planned Parenthood v. CLA is that a statement is a true threat if a reasonable
person making the statement would foresee that it would be
interpreted by the person to whom it is made as a serious
expression to inflict harm or assault. It is a felony.

wy69


6 posted on 10/31/2025 10:28:04 AM PDT by whitney69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Common sense dictates that if you want to film in such circumstances, you need to directly stream what you are filming to a safe location. Granted, the cop and, or leftist might still trash your gear, but they won’t get away with it as easily.


7 posted on 10/31/2025 1:07:23 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Stare too long into the dachshund and the dachshund stares back.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson