Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Virginia Giuffre Was a 'Huge Trump Fan' Because She Believed He'd Release Epstein Files, Ghostwriter Says
People ^ | October 20, 2025 | Meredith Kile

Posted on 10/30/2025 2:56:09 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege

Virginia Giuffre was a "huge Trump fan," according to the woman who helped write her posthumous memoir, Nobody's Girl.

Giuffre's ghostwriter, Amy Wallace, spoke with CBS Sunday Morning correspondent Tracy Smith about the book, as well as Giuffre's feelings toward Trump, a former friend of Epstein.

"She was a huge Trump fan, because he campaigned on releasing the Epstein files," Wallace revealed in the interview, which was broadcast on Oct. 19. "She was very excited that he had made that one of the main planks of his campaign, and she felt validated by it."

Giuffre did not implicate Trump in any of the claims of abuse made in her book, and she allegedly told Wallace that the future president was "kind to her" when the pair were introduced at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida.

Giuffre's father worked in maintenance at the resort, and after Giuffre got a job at the Mar-a-Lago spa, Maxwell recruited her for Epstein to reportedly traffic to his rich and powerful friends.

Asked whether Giuffre ever accused Trump of wrongdoing during their private conversations, Wallace said, "She never talked about him in any sense that he was involved in any of this."

"As far as she knew, and again, she was there for two plus years, but as far as she knew, [Trump] was not involved in the ring of trafficking that Epstein was working," Wallace added.

(Excerpt) Read more at people.com ...


TOPICS: Books/Literature
KEYWORDS: betterthanthat; concerntrolling; epstein; epsteinfiles; princeandrew; trump; virginagiuffre

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


1 posted on 10/30/2025 2:56:09 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

The executive branch likely doesn’t have the power to release if he wanted to.


2 posted on 10/30/2025 2:59:40 PM PDT by Jonty30 (Socialism's promises, like a Djinn's wishes to the greedy, lead to punishment when due. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Thanks, I was just going to say that. I believe it’s the courts that have the final say, mostly because of victims and people who had false allegations made against them.


3 posted on 10/30/2025 3:06:00 PM PDT by mass55th (“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

“”””She was a huge Trump fan, because he campaigned on releasing the Epstein files,” Wallace revealed in the interview, which was broadcast on Oct. 19. “She was very excited that he had made that one of the main planks of his campaign, and she felt validated by it.” “”””

Main planks???? Maybe he mentioned it, I don’t remember it. Certainly not an issue of any importance to most.


4 posted on 10/30/2025 3:07:42 PM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
The executive branch likely doesn’t have the power to release if he wanted to.

Obama judge said exactly that in rejecting AG Bondi's filing.

5 posted on 10/30/2025 3:49:18 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

It’s a little hard to do when the Supreme Court put everything under seal.


6 posted on 10/30/2025 4:01:22 PM PDT by roving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roving

Not Supreme Court. Federal Court.


7 posted on 10/30/2025 4:01:35 PM PDT by roving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Well DUH of course Trump was NOT involved with Epstein in that way..but those in the files are CIA agents and other foreign leaders, and unfortunately the way it is is that both sides have reason to keep those names private. If Biden’s goons thought they could gain something by releasing those files they would have


8 posted on 10/30/2025 4:04:06 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

She’s gone-history. Make up anything you want.


9 posted on 10/30/2025 4:50:07 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Fooled her!


10 posted on 10/30/2025 7:08:49 PM PDT by DesertRhino (When men on the chessboard, get up and tell you where to go…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roving
A federal district court blocked the release of grand jury testimony in the Epstein case, but that does not prevent the release of no doubt highly revealing federal investigative files as to Epstein.

My guess is that the Epstein files are being held back because of a complex tangle of confidentiality agreements, national security issues, and concerns over potential international blowback.

For example, Prince Andrew has lost his royal title and residence due to revelations about his links to Epstein. The British monarchy itself may even be jeopardy. Spurring such issues by releasing the Epstein files is not in the interests of the US.

11 posted on 10/30/2025 8:07:25 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson