Finally, an appropriate thread in which to post it:
Single, early to late middle-aged, college educated, white women that have several cats need something to belong to.............
“If you continue to listen to the video, you’ll hear Alpert attack “therapy culture,” which pathologizes everything, giving people labels that make them believe that they have a diagnosis. “
If you have a mental issue, the best way to make it worse is to go see a shrink.
You also get addicted to the weekly sessions.
God help us if we ever give ‘em the vote - Rooster Cogburn
“The bottom line is that these are unhappy, maladjusted people, especially unhappy women, who need the therapy of stupid costumes, mean signs, damaging beliefs (pro-Hamas, open borders, hating Trump, believing in transgenderism) to validate their lives and explain away their unhappiness. “
I wonder what percentage of these women live alone and have no man in their lives.
“The problem, of course, is biology. Women are more emotional. That part of our brains is bigger and needs to be to stimulate maternal nurturing. But leftist women have taken that emotionalism and applied it to politics. They are the living embodiment of Carol Hanisch’s 1969 essay entitled “The Personal Is Political.” This idea has taken over the Democrat party, which is largely powered by female madness (as Helen Andrews masterfully pointed out). “
The number one reason why the 19th wasn’t such a good idea.
And these women are the first to go vote!
Here is the basis, as she admits, of her argument:
The Great Feminization
Helen Andrews, October 16, 2025
https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-great-feminization/
Excerpt:
In 2019, I read an article about Larry Summers and Harvard that changed the way I look at the world. The author, writing under the pseudonym “J. Stone,” argued that the day Larry Summers resigned as president of Harvard University marked a turning point in our culture. The entire “woke” era could be extrapolated from that moment, from the details of how Summers was cancelled and, most of all, who did the cancelling: women.
The basic facts of the Summers case were familiar to me. On January 14, 2005, at a conference on “Diversifying the Science and Engineering Workforce,” Larry Summers gave a talk that was supposed to be off the record. In it, he said that female underrepresentation in hard sciences was partly due to “different availability of aptitude at the high end” as well as taste differences between men and women “not attributable to socialization.” Some female professors in attendance were offended and sent his remarks to a reporter, in defiance of the off-the-record rule. The ensuing scandal led to a no-confidence vote by the Harvard faculty and, eventually, Summers’s resignation.
The essay argued that it wasn’t just that women had cancelled the president of Harvard; it was that they’d cancelled him in a very feminine way. They made emotional appeals rather than logical arguments. “When he started talking about innate differences in aptitude between men and women, I just couldn’t breathe because this kind of bias makes me physically ill,” said Nancy Hopkins, a biologist at MIT. Summers made a public statement clarifying his remarks, and then another, and then a third, with the apology more insistent each time. Experts chimed in to declare that everything Summers had said about sex differences was within the scientific mainstream. These rational appeals had no effect on the mob hysteria.
“educated”
Not
really
Queens say who’s going to be king Biden winks.
Finally, an appropriate thread in which to post it:
Bkmk
good to know it concerns older hags — hopefully the young child-bearing demo is more liberated from the derangement, and willing to embrace a healthy family lifestyle with many children