Replies

As always, lt is your choice to educate yourself, or to ignore the truth. I believe this is the truth, because the evidence keeps coming forth that makes the case that this is indeed the truth.

The following is what AI had to say about it:

The study referenced in the film An Inconvenient Study was led by Dr. Marcus Zervos, a leading infectious disease expert at the Henry Ford Health System, who was commissioned by journalist Del Bigtree to conduct a comparison between the health outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated children.

The study was completed in 2020 but was not published, according to claims by Del Bigtree and his organization, the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), who argue that the results were suppressed due to their implications on vaccine safety. ICAN and Bigtree assert that the study was never submitted for publication because the findings were deemed inconvenient by the medical-industrial complex. However, Henry Ford Health System officials have stated that the study was not published because it failed to meet their rigorous scientific standards and contained significant methodological flaws, including major baseline imbalances between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. They also claim the study was not properly vetted by epidemiologists and statisticians within the institution, and that the lead researcher lacked formal training in epidemiology. Therefore, while Dr. Zervos is credited as the lead author, the responsibility for the study's conduct and its suppression is attributed to both the researchers involved and the institutional review process at Henry Ford Health, according to conflicting narratives.

MY BROTHER CALLS IT “THE MEDICAL MERRY-GO ‘ROUND”.

HE SMOKED & HIS HEALTH IS WORSE THAN MINE.

I TAKE NO PRESCRIPTIONS.

NO ‘OLD FARTS FLU’ SHOTS

NO DOCTOR OF RECORD

LAST ANYTHING NEAR TO “AN ANNUAL EXAM” ===NOV 1988.

TAKE VITAMINS & SUPPLEMENTS—FOR JOINTS & EYES.

AM STILL RUNNING 5 ACRE SMALL HORSE RANCH—ALMOST 86-FEMALE

I have made a long study of the elitist belief in population reduction as a matter of "sustainability" I first learned about from Henry Lamb (RIP my friend) who became something of a mentor to me. The underlying principle of the globalist "culture" is that because people can and do despoil natural landscapes that humanity is ultimately and inalterably destructive in its pursuit of ego, comfort, and/or dominance (with which they are self-righteously obsessed). This is why I embarked upon a native plant restoration project of some 25 years. I felt that true stewardship is more a matter of managing competing risks than an inherently destructive tendency. I wanted to prove them wrong.

< href="https://www.wildergarten.org/wildergarten/1trp-intro.pdf">That project has been uniquely successful. What I have demonstrated in the process is that we don't have the technologies or labor available to keep the biological systems we took from aboriginal peoples by force alive and reproducing (the part they forgot about). Humans have sustained biodiversity by managed disturbance for many millennia, to which the system became genetically-adapted and without which the consequence is slow destruction of that system by exotic species those same globalists have been principally responsible for their introduction. The best we can do now is to keep islands of native genetics alive and reproducing, the belief in Reed Noss' equally idiotic "connecting corridors" as means to sustain the system will effectively function as conduits for contagion by which the niche separation that once sustained biodiversity will be hybridized into non-existence. The belief that seed banks could suffice is simply stupid without insect or microbial symbiotes from which to learn how those life systems worked dynamically.

My goal is to teach the elitists of this world that they have made a potentially-suicidal mistake in pursuing the demise of their brethren. What we actually need is a new industry by which to sustain representative samples of island biodiversity later to move onto the landscape scale once we know more about what we are doing. There is still time to reverse course, but we don't have more than a century to do so insofar as the plants and microbes are concerned. About insects I am less sanguine, but they are remarkably adaptive.