10/6/2025, 5:08:13 PM · by ransomnote · 24 replies
YOUTUBE ^ | Jul 27, 2025 | Devin Nunes, Maria Bartiromo
“””If the only things they would be permitted to report are official releases, there’s no reason to have press credentials because the releases are all online anyway. “”
That sounds like a win to me.
Sounds good to me, the questions they ask are rarely worthwhile ans not anout finding out information but some kind of gotcha
Most of those press briefings remind me of flying on Spirit airlines, a room full of animals
>> I’m actually with the press on this one.
Well, I’m with you and the press on the concept of getting their America-hating traitorious asses the hell out of the Pentagon, never again to return, but somehow I don’t think that’s what you meant!
News flash: the Department of WAR is NOT Commerce or Treasury or &etc. Different rules apply! Common sense!
The moles and leakers are the big losers. They are losing a second income. The press is their facilitator and probably their financiers.
The level of control implemented here is identical to that presently covering all military bases.
Only where secret material is stored has the MSM had unfettered access.
A few trials would illustrate this point.
Here is the thing: No military member can make a press release without commander’s allowance anyway.
After 70 years of personally observing the selective, disingenuous "reporting" of the Western Mainstream Media, I'm NOT!
As a youth, I delivered honest newspapers to subscribers.
As a senior citizen I don rubber gloves to pickup the Anti American printed trash thrown on my property against my wishes.
Screw the "Press" good and hard until they reform or die.
I believe most, if not all, of the news anchors in the table below were likely subject to quiet removal due to their participation in the RussiaGate conspiracy against Donald J Trump.
Sen Johnson (1) and Devin Nunes (2, 3) said in interviews (2025) that the MSM played a major role in RussiaGate and prevented the truth from reaching the public. They lumped media together with the 2 dozen or so Deep Staters (Obama, Comey, Hillary, etc.) who moved together (with some exceptions) through each of the fake hoaxes the Dems/MSM launched to try to incriminate or remove PResident Donald Trump in his first term.
I asked GROK for a list of prominent news anchors who resigned in the past 7 years and from that list, I asked GROK to list only those who played a significant role reporting on Russiagate (hoping it would cover all of the Obama, Hillary, Mueller attempts).
Here's the list of RussiaGate anchors, the DATE RANGE they were reporting on RussiaGate, the name of their news outlet, the date they resigned, and the hyperlinked source for that information.
Name Date Range for Reporting on Russiagate Company Reason Given for Departure Date of Departure Thomas Frank January 2017 – June 2017 CNN Resignation following the retraction of a Russia-related story alleging ties between Trump associate Anthony Scaramucci and a Russian investment fund under investigation; editorial processes not followed. June 26, 2017 Eric Lichtblau April 2017 – June 2017 CNN Resignation following the retraction of a Russia-related story alleging ties between Trump associate Anthony Scaramucci and a Russian investment fund under investigation; editorial processes not followed. June 26, 2017 Lex Haris January 2017 – June 2017 CNN Resignation following the retraction of a Russia-related story alleging ties between Trump associate Anthony Scaramucci and a Russian investment fund under investigation; editorial processes not followed. June 26, 2017
Name Date Range News Outlet Date of Resignation Source for Resignation Date Joy Reid 2016–2019 MSNBC Announced February 24, 2025 USA Today Jim Acosta 2017–2019 CNN January 28, 2025 USA Today Chuck Todd 2017–2019 NBC News January 2025 USA Today Andrea Mitchell 2016–2019 MSNBC/NBC News Early 2025 (announced December 2024) Newsweek Alisyn Camerota 2017–2019 CNN December 2024 TV Insider Don Lemon 2017–2019 CNN April 24, 2023 CNN Brian Williams 2017–2019 MSNBC December 9, 2021 USA Today Chris Cuomo 2017–2019 CNN December 4, 2021 CNN Shepard Smith 2017–2019 Fox News October 11, 2019 New York Times Tucker Carlson 2017–2019 Fox News April 24, 2023 NPR Chris Wallace 2017–2019 Fox News (later CNN) November 2024 Adweek Poppy Harlow 2017–2019 CNN April 2024 Adweek
Devin Nunes' report (two links at the very bottom) proves the MSM never had a single shred of evidence, because the original intel report he prepared proved that Trump and Putin were not involved in Russian collusion. The CIA, Mueller and all other intel provided zero basis for the accusations of RussiaGate, yet the MS worked to unseat the duly elected president for years, up to an including trying to stop him from being re-elected.
The MSM never followed the truth in the assasination attempts. The MSM was present, set up to film the assasination on the golf course. They are the enemy. If they don't want to be treated like the enemies they are, then they need to publicly accept accountability for the past decade of lies, issue public retractings for all those years of lies, fight to uproot treason in their ranks and work to earn the public trust for the next 10 years. They stand a tiny chance of earning respect but it's unlikely as long as they prance around, preening as if they have a reputation for noble truth warriors.
In the quote below, Benz is talking about the fact tat the RussiaGate hoax was not based on intel (there was none). Think back and recall the MSM was the (proud) engine driving 'the narrative' and that it daintily wiped its hands without ethical retractions of years worth of their work, and firings of staff, when Trump was cleared of charges.
Interesting interview from Devin Nunes discussing how his report exposed the RussiaGate hoax - it was based on lies, not intel.Russiagate Revisited: Uncovering the Truth
(excerpt) John Solomon ReportsJuly 30, 2025
SNIP
Mike Benz: Let me make this completely clear. This is how much of it was ever substantiated - nothing, none of it. If you read the January 6, 2017 CIA report on Russian interference, all they allege is that Russian social media accounts, like Russia Today and Sputnik, had gotten far more engagement during the 2016 election cycle, and that they hypothesized that the Russians favored Trump, and so therefore Sputnik and RT were having an influence.
It was only after that that they came up with Russian bots and trolls. And here's how much they claimed to find, about $150,000 worth of the Facebook ads, half of which supported Hillary Clinton. None of that was corroborated. We don't know if those were just random Americans using a Russian VPN so that their IP address look like it came from Russia. That was a popular thing to do; to use VPN to pipe in from Central and Eastern Europe, or Belarus, or Russia, to mask your IP address.
SNIP
They were bluffing the entire time.
Re: 7 - of course, when the shoe is on the other foot, people will be wailing about there being limited access, if in fact there is a Dem administration that continues with this policy.
For people poor at discernment, it all depends on which tribe is in power.
” If the only things they would be permitted to report are official releases, there’s no reason to have press credentials because the releases are all online anyway.”
Here’s an interesting story. The week before the Pearl Harbor attack our War Plan Rainbow was leaked and published in the Chicago Tribune. Caused quite a stir but was forgotten after the attack. I guess you’re okay with this kind of thing.
“I’m actually with the press on this one.”
Agree. Love Hegseth, but he jumped the shark on this one. Government over-reach.
Someone on Newsmax said they won’t comply.