10/6/2025, 5:08:13 PM · by ransomnote · 24 replies
YOUTUBE ^ | Jul 27, 2025 | Devin Nunes, Maria Bartiromo
Posted on 10/16/2025 8:37:42 AM PDT by ransomnote
[H/T Melian]
News outlets were nearly unanimous in rejecting new rules imposed by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that would leave journalists vulnerable to expulsion if they sought to report on information — classified or otherwise — that had not been approved by Hegseth for release.
SNIP
“It’s sad, but I’m also really proud of the press corps that we stuck together,” said Nancy Youssef, a reporter for The Atlantic who has had a desk at the Pentagon since 2007.
SNIP
Images of reporters effectively demonstrating against barriers to their work are unlikely to move supporters of President Donald Trump, many of whom resent journalists and cheer his efforts to make their jobs harder. Trump has been involved in court fights against The New York Times, CBS News, ABC News, the Wall Street Journal and The Associated Press in the past year.
SNIP
Speaking to reporters at the White House on Tuesday, Trump backed his defense secretary’s new rules. “I think he finds the press to be very disruptive in terms of world peace,” Trump said. “The press is very dishonest.”
Even before issuing his new press policy, Hegseth, a former Fox News Channel host, has systematically choked off the flow of information. He’s held only two formal press briefings, banned reporters from accessing many parts of the sprawling Pentagon without an escort and launched investigations into leaks to the media.
SNIP
“What they’re really doing, they want to spoon-feed information to the journalist, and that would be their story. That’s not journalism,” said Jack Keane, a retired U.S. Army general and Fox News analyst, said on Hegseth’s former network.
(Excerpt) Read more at opb.org ...
That was easy!
“What they’re really doing, they want to spoon-feed information to the journalist, and that would be their story. That’s not journalism,” said Jack Keane, a retired U.S. Army general and Fox News analyst, said on Hegseth’s former network.
“Journalism” has become a lying, stealing and ruling game.
“What they’re really doing, they want to spoon-feed information to the journalist, and that would be their story. That’s not journalism,” said Jack Keane, a retired U.S. Army general and Fox News analyst, said on Hegseth’s former network.
This “journalism” has become a lying, stealing & ruling game.
Outstanding. Get ‘em, Pete!
These sensible safeguards are long overdue, especially given what a bunch of leftwing activists these “journalists” are. They would gladly compromise our national security in order to damage this administration.
Sounds like good news. They aren’t journalists, they are propagandists for commies.
Yikes! I kept thinking Oregon PUblic Broadcasting and reasoned it couldn’t be that commonly posted. But then again,I should have registered that both were AP writers!
Buh, buh, bye.
Here is the thing: No military member can make a press release without commander’s allowance anyway.
OK. Bye.
After 70 years of personally observing the selective, disingenuous "reporting" of the Western Mainstream Media, I'm NOT!
As a youth, I delivered honest newspapers to subscribers.
As a senior citizen I don rubber gloves to pickup the Anti American printed trash thrown on my property against my wishes.
Screw the "Press" good and hard until they reform or die.
The part that I think was wrong was requiring the press to seek prior approval prior to printing stories even if all the information contained therein was non-classified.
We only found out about the DEI training, lowering of standards for females, etc. etc. etc., because they were reported on. I don't think a policy that requires prior approval before reporting non-classified information is a good one because it means that other information like that can be more easily covered up in the future..
That being said...exactly what is going to be the actual impact of this policy? Not the intent of the policy -- about which I could not care less -- but the actual effect of the new policy?
The only reason this policy is seen as necessary is because Hegseth was unable to stop leaks from the Pentagon side of things. So because he can't stop the leaks from Pentagon employees, he's trying to stop the press from printing those leaks. Except as soon as all the press refuse to sign the agreement, that goal fails because the leaks will keep happening, and the press can just keep printing them.
So I'm not sure what is being accomplished.
Obviously, the Biden Administration didn't want any of that reported, but it got out anyway. But if Biden had this same policy, we might never have known.
it sounds like the problem is being cleaned up
there is no alternative to maintaining security over war-defense-related information, at least on a current basis
publishing it can cost a lot of lives as our mass media (intentionally or not) serves enemy forces and terrorist gangs by being-— in effect — their spies in our Pentagon
Journalists who don’t abide by the policy risk losing credentials that provide access to the Pentagon, under a 17-page memo distributed Friday that steps up media restrictions imposed by the administration of President Donald Trump.
“Information must be approved for public release by an appropriate authorizing official before it is released, even if it is unclassified,” the directive states. The signature form includes an array of security requirements for credentialed media at the Pentagon.
https://apnews.com/article/pentagon-press-media-restrictions-nondisclosure-8420d3a80de20a39605c588d9990c582
The funny thing about this is that under Hegseth's rules, the press apparently couldn't even report that he had instituted this entire policy unless he first gave them permission to do so.
They had no choice but to decline.
“Nancy Youssef, a reporter for The Atlantic”
Islamic name for a constantly lying America hating racist “news” outlet. Aww shucks.
I believe most, if not all, of the news anchors in the table below were likely subject to quiet removal due to their participation in the RussiaGate conspiracy against Donald J Trump.
Sen Johnson (1) and Devin Nunes (2, 3) said in interviews (2025) that the MSM played a major role in RussiaGate and prevented the truth from reaching the public. They lumped media together with the 2 dozen or so Deep Staters (Obama, Comey, Hillary, etc.) who moved together (with some exceptions) through each of the fake hoaxes the Dems/MSM launched to try to incriminate or remove PResident Donald Trump in his first term.
I asked GROK for a list of prominent news anchors who resigned in the past 7 years and from that list, I asked GROK to list only those who played a significant role reporting on Russiagate (hoping it would cover all of the Obama, Hillary, Mueller attempts).
Here's the list of RussiaGate anchors, the DATE RANGE they were reporting on RussiaGate, the name of their news outlet, the date they resigned, and the hyperlinked source for that information.
Name Date Range for Reporting on Russiagate Company Reason Given for Departure Date of Departure Thomas Frank January 2017 – June 2017 CNN Resignation following the retraction of a Russia-related story alleging ties between Trump associate Anthony Scaramucci and a Russian investment fund under investigation; editorial processes not followed. June 26, 2017 Eric Lichtblau April 2017 – June 2017 CNN Resignation following the retraction of a Russia-related story alleging ties between Trump associate Anthony Scaramucci and a Russian investment fund under investigation; editorial processes not followed. June 26, 2017 Lex Haris January 2017 – June 2017 CNN Resignation following the retraction of a Russia-related story alleging ties between Trump associate Anthony Scaramucci and a Russian investment fund under investigation; editorial processes not followed. June 26, 2017
Name Date Range News Outlet Date of Resignation Source for Resignation Date Joy Reid 2016–2019 MSNBC Announced February 24, 2025 USA Today Jim Acosta 2017–2019 CNN January 28, 2025 USA Today Chuck Todd 2017–2019 NBC News January 2025 USA Today Andrea Mitchell 2016–2019 MSNBC/NBC News Early 2025 (announced December 2024) Newsweek Alisyn Camerota 2017–2019 CNN December 2024 TV Insider Don Lemon 2017–2019 CNN April 24, 2023 CNN Brian Williams 2017–2019 MSNBC December 9, 2021 USA Today Chris Cuomo 2017–2019 CNN December 4, 2021 CNN Shepard Smith 2017–2019 Fox News October 11, 2019 New York Times Tucker Carlson 2017–2019 Fox News April 24, 2023 NPR Chris Wallace 2017–2019 Fox News (later CNN) November 2024 Adweek Poppy Harlow 2017–2019 CNN April 2024 Adweek
Devin Nunes' report (two links at the very bottom) proves the MSM never had a single shred of evidence, because the original intel report he prepared proved that Trump and Putin were not involved in Russian collusion. The CIA, Mueller and all other intel provided zero basis for the accusations of RussiaGate, yet the MS worked to unseat the duly elected president for years, up to an including trying to stop him from being re-elected.
The MSM never followed the truth in the assasination attempts. The MSM was present, set up to film the assasination on the golf course. They are the enemy. If they don't want to be treated like the enemies they are, then they need to publicly accept accountability for the past decade of lies, issue public retractings for all those years of lies, fight to uproot treason in their ranks and work to earn the public trust for the next 10 years. They stand a tiny chance of earning respect but it's unlikely as long as they prance around, preening as if they have a reputation for noble truth warriors.
In the quote below, Benz is talking about the fact tat the RussiaGate hoax was not based on intel (there was none). Think back and recall the MSM was the (proud) engine driving 'the narrative' and that it daintily wiped its hands without ethical retractions of years worth of their work, and firings of staff, when Trump was cleared of charges.
Interesting interview from Devin Nunes discussing how his report exposed the RussiaGate hoax - it was based on lies, not intel.Russiagate Revisited: Uncovering the Truth
(excerpt) John Solomon ReportsJuly 30, 2025
SNIP
Mike Benz: Let me make this completely clear. This is how much of it was ever substantiated - nothing, none of it. If you read the January 6, 2017 CIA report on Russian interference, all they allege is that Russian social media accounts, like Russia Today and Sputnik, had gotten far more engagement during the 2016 election cycle, and that they hypothesized that the Russians favored Trump, and so therefore Sputnik and RT were having an influence.
It was only after that that they came up with Russian bots and trolls. And here's how much they claimed to find, about $150,000 worth of the Facebook ads, half of which supported Hillary Clinton. None of that was corroborated. We don't know if those were just random Americans using a Russian VPN so that their IP address look like it came from Russia. That was a popular thing to do; to use VPN to pipe in from Central and Eastern Europe, or Belarus, or Russia, to mask your IP address.
SNIP
They were bluffing the entire time.
I guess everyone has forgotten how corrupt the DoW is.
This is great news!!!!
Re: 7 - of course, when the shoe is on the other foot, people will be wailing about there being limited access, if in fact there is a Dem administration that continues with this policy.
For people poor at discernment, it all depends on which tribe is in power.
Bingo. Those that are poor at discernment are probably not going to comprehend what you posted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.