Facilitators can stack the participant pool with individuals who already hold or are predisposed to racist views. By carefully selecting "experts" or group members who share similar biases, the facilitator ensures that the range of opinions leans toward a racist consensus. For example, if the Delphi process is used to develop policies on community integration, a biased facilitator might exclude voices from marginalized groups or those likely to challenge discriminatory ideas, creating an echo chamber that normalizes racist assumptions.
Framing of Questions and Feedback: The Delphi Technique relies on facilitators to design questions and summarize feedback between rounds. A facilitator with a racist agenda could frame questions in ways that subtly promote stereotypes or discriminatory assumptions, such as asking, "How can we address the challenges posed by [specific group] in our community?" rather than neutral questions about integration or diversity. Summaries of group responses can also be manipulated to emphasize racist sentiments, marginalizing dissenting or inclusive viewpoints. Over successive rounds, participants may feel pressured to align with the apparent majority view, even if it’s skewed by the facilitator’s framing.
Anonymity as a Tool for Conformity: While anonymity in the Delphi Technique is meant to encourage honest input, it can also shield racist views from direct scrutiny, allowing them to persist unchallenged. Participants who might otherwise question prejudiced ideas in an open setting may feel less accountable in an anonymous process, especially if feedback suggests their views are outliers. A facilitator can exploit this by highlighting responses that align with racist ideologies, creating a false sense of consensus that pressures dissenting participants to conform.
Iterative Refinement to Suppress Dissent: The iterative nature of the Delphi Technique, where participants refine their responses based on group feedback, can be used to gradually erode opposition to racist ideas. If facilitators repeatedly present summaries that amplify racist sentiments or downplay inclusive perspectives, participants with neutral or anti-racist views may feel isolated and adjust their responses to align with the perceived majority. This can create a feedback loop where racist ideas gain legitimacy through repetition, mimicking the dynamics of groupthink.
In the broader context, media propaganda can amplify this process by priming participants with racist narratives before or during the Delphi process. For instance, if media campaigns consistently portray a specific group as a threat, participants may enter the Delphi process with preconceived biases, making them more susceptible to a facilitator’s manipulation. This synergy between media influence and a corrupted Delphi process can entrench racist attitudes, as participants are nudged toward a predetermined consensus under the guise of objective deliberation. The outcome of such manipulation is a group that conforms to racist ideologies, believing their conclusions are the result of reasoned consensus rather than orchestrated bias. This can have severe societal consequences, such as the development of discriminatory policies or the reinforcement of systemic prejudice. To prevent this, the Delphi Technique must be implemented with transparency, diverse participant representation, and neutral facilitation. Encouraging critical thinking and open dialogue outside the process, alongside skepticism of media narratives, is crucial to counteracting the risk of conformity to harmful ideologies like racism.
Thanks