Posted on 10/09/2025 10:24:09 AM PDT by marcusmaximus
![]() |
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
And just like that, there were no Ukraine posts any more.
““It’s not ‘what’s lacking in India’ anymore, it’s about ‘what’s possible’ here.”
MIGA! He’s got it right!
Good. Bye.
“I haven’t been to India in 8 years. I chased the same American dream like everyone else and that is why I can say this - because for years, people like me have treated the US as the ultimate achievement.”
It’s our fault that he put our country above his and his fellow country made him feel this way. Also Trump’s fault.
Don’t let the door hit ya’ where the good Lord split ya’!
Facilitators can stack the participant pool with individuals who already hold or are predisposed to racist views. By carefully selecting "experts" or group members who share similar biases, the facilitator ensures that the range of opinions leans toward a racist consensus. For example, if the Delphi process is used to develop policies on community integration, a biased facilitator might exclude voices from marginalized groups or those likely to challenge discriminatory ideas, creating an echo chamber that normalizes racist assumptions.
Framing of Questions and Feedback: The Delphi Technique relies on facilitators to design questions and summarize feedback between rounds. A facilitator with a racist agenda could frame questions in ways that subtly promote stereotypes or discriminatory assumptions, such as asking, "How can we address the challenges posed by [specific group] in our community?" rather than neutral questions about integration or diversity. Summaries of group responses can also be manipulated to emphasize racist sentiments, marginalizing dissenting or inclusive viewpoints. Over successive rounds, participants may feel pressured to align with the apparent majority view, even if it’s skewed by the facilitator’s framing.
Anonymity as a Tool for Conformity: While anonymity in the Delphi Technique is meant to encourage honest input, it can also shield racist views from direct scrutiny, allowing them to persist unchallenged. Participants who might otherwise question prejudiced ideas in an open setting may feel less accountable in an anonymous process, especially if feedback suggests their views are outliers. A facilitator can exploit this by highlighting responses that align with racist ideologies, creating a false sense of consensus that pressures dissenting participants to conform.
Iterative Refinement to Suppress Dissent: The iterative nature of the Delphi Technique, where participants refine their responses based on group feedback, can be used to gradually erode opposition to racist ideas. If facilitators repeatedly present summaries that amplify racist sentiments or downplay inclusive perspectives, participants with neutral or anti-racist views may feel isolated and adjust their responses to align with the perceived majority. This can create a feedback loop where racist ideas gain legitimacy through repetition, mimicking the dynamics of groupthink.
In the broader context, media propaganda can amplify this process by priming participants with racist narratives before or during the Delphi process. For instance, if media campaigns consistently portray a specific group as a threat, participants may enter the Delphi process with preconceived biases, making them more susceptible to a facilitator’s manipulation. This synergy between media influence and a corrupted Delphi process can entrench racist attitudes, as participants are nudged toward a predetermined consensus under the guise of objective deliberation. The outcome of such manipulation is a group that conforms to racist ideologies, believing their conclusions are the result of reasoned consensus rather than orchestrated bias. This can have severe societal consequences, such as the development of discriminatory policies or the reinforcement of systemic prejudice. To prevent this, the Delphi Technique must be implemented with transparency, diverse participant representation, and neutral facilitation. Encouraging critical thinking and open dialogue outside the process, alongside skepticism of media narratives, is crucial to counteracting the risk of conformity to harmful ideologies like racism.
“I chased the same American dream like everyone else”
Since he’s not American, why did he think it was his to chase?
Had no history here. Had no ancestors who came here on wooden ships to an untamed wilderness....like mine. Had no ancestors who crossed the plains in wagons...like mine. Had no ancestors who fought each other in a bitter war over the status of Africans...like mine. Had no parents or relatives who came back from the wars maimed or didn’t come back at all...like mine.
So uh...what were his credentials to just drop in and slurp up the bennies?
His status as a “disadvantaged minority”? That’s rich. He’s a minority precisely because he’s a national of another country: it’s by definition. Doesn’t entitle you to privileges.
How much Trash does this guy throw into US rivers ?
As Indians like to say: Tata!
Dot’s funny!
Oh, brother! I worked with LOTS of Indian nationals in Silicon Valley.
1. We work twice as hard for half the recognition — Uh, NO. I didn’t see any particularly hard-working Indians. Most clocked in and out on the dot.
2. We swallow our accent — Uh, nope, never saw that.
3. We change our names - nope, nope, nope. Never saw that. Lots of Chinese people adopt American names because theirs do not transliterate well. Not once did I meet a single Indian guy named “John” or “William” or “Trevor.” It was always Vivek or Rishi or Rohan or Deepak. At least the native Indian names were easy to pronounce (a benefit of the English colonization of India centuries ago).
Afraid Trump might find out he doesn’t pay taxes ?
Thanks
AMF!
What USA gave u is the dollar which u converted to rupee that is the only reason u stayed in USA lets be clear about this,” commented another
How can Americans compete with that? These Hindus think they have a right to come to the USA. Indus it’s a privilege just to visit the USA for 90 days let alone work in the USA.
Shut up with your stupid sh1t
Disadvantaged? The ones that come here are mostly from the upper caste.
Shut it, dumbus. Go fellate the troll’s posterior.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.