[Jumper]

Good you finally did some research and it it not word for word. He actually attributes to the Russian General staff. I took the essence and put it together with other sources.

Now, can you actually refute it. No. It is a plan that is both in keeping with the objectives a d timelines the Russians stated.

You can clearly see that Ukraine is dancing to the Russian op tempo and advancement timeliness.

The way he presents this is a timeline in motion since March and April 25.

Thus NATO is truly reacting to a conflict Russia is dictating.

But this not all I posted.

Now if you can read and understand, Ukraine has been reduced to bleeding and is already defeated.

Now go do some more research and learn something else on any topic.

[Timber Rattler]

Good you finally did some research and it it not word for word. He actually attributes to the Russian General staff. I took the essence and put it together with other sources.

No, you plagiarized it and claimed it as your own. Just changing a few words does not make it otherwise.

Face it...you got caught.

[Widget Jr]

Let's see, you copied someone else's work, edited it, and presented as your own.

Even worse, Khairullin's article was written in March, about events that happened last year, and you are treating it as current.

Plagiarism and bad faith are not good ways to start honest discussion, let alone demand it after getting caught.