IOW - not made by my ‘friends’ in the MIC that kickback to my pockets.....?????
If your chain of command is wrapped around the axle controling "who sees what" and busy micromanaging what everyone is doing, it seems like you may moving too slow.
Maybe we should just have IT inflict multifactor authentication, every five minutes, on the enemy and paralyze them too!
“battlefield”
Absolute BS. “Domestic Surveillance” in our military police state is the reality...
Palantir has its fingers in many areas of our government.
They run the immigration database.
They run the Covid-19 vaccine database.
They run the entire healthcare database including individual medical records for UK.
They are the link between the FBI, CIA, and many other security databases.
They run a worldwide financial transaction database.
And most important, Peter Thiel who owns Palantir, also owns JD Vance, and is former business partners and friends with Elon Musk as they started PayPal together.
Bkmk
Reuters!
For goodness’ sake, when has Reuters ever produced anything but BS propaganda?
Kamalalala is smarter than Reuters personnel, and she is dumber than whale poop...
BKMK
Per Breaking Defense:
The US Army says it has mitigated several cybersecurity risks discovered in an early iteration of its nascent Next Generation Command and Control (NGC2) platform, as detailed in a blunt memo obtained by Breaking Defense....
Army officials told Breaking Defense that in the three-plus weeks since the document was written and subsequently circulated within industry, the problems have been addressed. “The issues were mitigated immediately,” Army Chief Information Officer Leonel Garciga said in a statement. He added that the “streamlined cyber security processes were able to quickly identify and assist the program office and vendor in triaging cyber security vulnerabilities and put mitigations in place.”
In a recent interview, Lt. Gen. Jeth Rey, deputy chief of staff at the Army’s G-6 which deals with Army cybersecurity and networks, argued that finding those early deficiencies early was all part of the service’s intended process, and that efforts were undertaken to correct them.
The pattern around this leak looks a lot like a market-manipulation play: selective or outdated information released at a tactical time to spark panic selling in a high-volatility stock. If true, that’s not a national-security disclosure — it’s a coordinated attempt to move markets for private gain. Regulators should investigate trading and options flows, timetamps of the leak, and any linked social-media amplification.