Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

The comparison is more suggestive than subjective. If the calculations were adjusted by the cost of gas, housing, sales taxes, food, and electricity, California would look a lot worse.


3 posted on 09/29/2025 8:34:19 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie

California is a good state to be poor in, the poor get lots of help there in all areas of expenses.


10 posted on 09/29/2025 9:07:23 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie

They should also tell the numbers of drug addicts who are the big drivers of poverty. Every penny a drug addict gets is spent on drugs and alcohol and all the other stuff they get is stolen.


15 posted on 09/29/2025 10:01:18 PM PDT by webheart (Notice how I said all of that without any hyphens, and only complete words? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie

Someone was doing something like that in a recent thread, comparing median income with cost of living. California has a very high median income, but when you adjust for COL, it doesn’t look so great.


21 posted on 09/30/2025 1:21:24 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie

Real intelligent point.
Versus AI 😂


22 posted on 09/30/2025 3:18:48 AM PDT by Bobbyvotes (Work is worship! .... Bhagavad Geeta. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson