Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...
And, this is an example of why I usually avoid talk radio and/or podcasts, other than as excerpts.

2 posted on 09/19/2025 2:35:34 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (NeverTrumpin' -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

Unfunny Kimmel didn’t get fired because he made fun of Trump’s “grieving process”.

He got fired for spouting lies that were known at the time to be lies by saying MAGA was bending over backwards to say the murderer was NOT one of them, when the facts about his anti-Trump and anti-Kirk sentiments were already known, and his verified homosexual relationship with a guy who wanted to be a female was public record.

He should have kept his mouth shut, but he simply isn’t capable of it given his history.


3 posted on 09/19/2025 2:42:01 PM PDT by rlmorel (Factio Communistica Sinensis Delenda Est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv
And, this is an example of why I usually avoid talk radio and/or podcasts, other than as excerpts.

If you don't mind a right-leaning culturally conservative Catholic libertarian, Tom Woods is an exceptional interviewer.
5 posted on 09/19/2025 3:02:45 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye." (John 2:5))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

Kimmil also got fired because of the affiliates, his ratings, and his unwillingness to take it back and apologize.

He thought he was in charge, and could order Disney about.


9 posted on 09/19/2025 3:19:48 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv
"In his monologue on Monday, Kimmel said the "Maga gang" was "desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them" and of trying to "score political points from it"."

My feelings are this on what he said. If you substituted "Maga Gang" with lets say "Ben Shapiro" would there be a case of slander or of libel if it was printed? As a group you can't really sue someone unless there is a formal legal association using that name, but had he directed it towards and individual would there be a legal cause for suing him? If so, then he is going too far and needed to be slapped down for it.

12 posted on 09/19/2025 3:26:07 PM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

Adam really dropped the ball on this one. He is unable to see the truth when it comes to his “buddy”.


16 posted on 09/19/2025 3:45:24 PM PDT by iamgalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

Adam we are all equal under the law... Right?

So question

Why is Jimmy entitled to That platform and to make that kind of money? But you’re not?

Why Adam don’t have the same right to the same platform and the same money?

Why Adam did you have to build your own podcast network versus Jimmy

The only difference between you Adam and Jimmy is your politics

And because of that Jimmy Kimmel has a right to that platform and all that money?

But you Not entitled to the platform same money.. you have to build your own platform?


24 posted on 09/19/2025 4:14:34 PM PDT by tophat9000 (Tophat90000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson