The lack of a mention being interpreted as an oversite is utterly ridiculous.
Charles literally revoked Harry’s royalty back in May 2025, the media could have just as easily said Trump was kind not to mention Harry, showing great restraint given the current Royal family problems. Suppose a liberal said exactly what Trump said that is how they would have reported it.
We can never hate the media enough and never distrust them enough!
Second the motion, and validate the thought.
These dumbasses said Trump was “cringy” for telling Kate she was beautiful to her face.
I believe the protocol is not to mention harry at all. He is basically persona non grata at this point.
Typically, in a normal situation you would mention harry because he is living the US. bring up bonds of allies blah blah blah.
But Harry is basically like Wallis simpson and her cuck.
So basically you dont bring it up
this is for everyone. unless the King mentions
This may also be true for Prince Andrew.
Prince William was not having anything to do with Andrew as andrew tried to engage him at the funeral. It was the equivalent of the William Scarfing Markle incident without the scarf.
That was an unfounded rumor. It takes an act of Parliament and would have been publicized very widely, with all the attendant claims of racism and manufactured black'n'brown riots all over the world.
Why King Charles is powerless to strip Meghan Markle and Prince Harry of their royal title