Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump makes dig at Harry by praising William as King Charles' 'remarkable son' during state banquet speech
daily mail ^ | 9/18/2025 | MARK DUELL, SENIOR REPORTER

Posted on 09/18/2025 9:04:10 AM PDT by RummyChick

Donald Trump appeared to take a veiled double swipe at Prince Harry during his state banquet speech as he lavished praise on Prince William and King Charles III.

The US President spoke highly of the Prince of Wales, describing him as the King's 'remarkable son' and 'really amazing' - with no mention of his brother Harry.

Mr Trump said last night: 'I just want to say that His Majesty has also raised a remarkable son in His Royal Highness, Prince of Wales. Really amazing. We've gotten to know you and I think you're going to have an unbelievable success in future.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: multiplenicks; nevertrumping; randpaulsucks; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last
To: pnz1

i have forgotten all the crazy things he did. something is wrong with him. But a different something than markle who appears to be a raging narcissist


61 posted on 09/18/2025 12:22:13 PM PDT by RummyChick (If I did not provide a link in my post none will be forthcoming )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: iamgalt

The world would have forgotten about the Harkles except for the DailyMail’s exhaustive, picayune coverage of their every move. Waste of gigabytes.


62 posted on 09/18/2025 12:29:16 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (RIP, Charlie. Say hi to Andrew Breitbart. God protect your family. Justice for Charlie Kirk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

IMO one’s as bad as the other. Nothing’s ever his fault, why won’t they forgive me/forget crappy things I’ve done, they’re jealous of my wife etc etc


63 posted on 09/18/2025 12:31:11 PM PDT by pnz1 ("These people have gone stone-cold crazy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Skwor
Charles literally revoked Harry’s royalty back in May 2025

That was an unfounded rumor. It takes an act of Parliament and would have been publicized very widely, with all the attendant claims of racism and manufactured black'n'brown riots all over the world.

Why King Charles is powerless to strip Meghan Markle and Prince Harry of their royal title

https://www.facebook.com/Yeniinka2020/posts/as-of-may-23-2025-there-is-no-official-confirmation-that-prince-harrys-titles-ha/1029210122648547/

64 posted on 09/18/2025 12:39:32 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (RIP, Charlie. Say hi to Andrew Breitbart. God protect your family. Justice for Charlie Kirk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Uhhhhhh...Harry is not Charles’s son.

Baseless rumors. Harry closely resembles Charles' father Philip. And please do not repost photos of Diana's lover whom she met when Harry was five years old. Do you think for one second that the Royals haven't had his DNA checked decades ago due to the couple's philandering and divorce?

65 posted on 09/18/2025 12:43:15 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (RIP, Charlie. Say hi to Andrew Breitbart. God protect your family. Justice for Charlie Kirk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
..the William Scarfing Markle incident without the scarf.

LOL!!

66 posted on 09/18/2025 12:44:47 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (RIP, Charlie. Say hi to Andrew Breitbart. God protect your family. Justice for Charlie Kirk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Have you ever seen the photo of Harry and Diana’s bodyguard side by side? They look like twins.

They do not. Similar coloring to every other ginger in Christendom; but very different bone structure.

67 posted on 09/18/2025 12:46:20 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (RIP, Charlie. Say hi to Andrew Breitbart. God protect your family. Justice for Charlie Kirk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cowboyusa

Yes, the Spencer side of the family - that’s what I was saying.


68 posted on 09/18/2025 1:44:45 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

Harry had titles removed, as far as the whole legal stuff, whatever, point stands that not mentioning harry was more of a respect than “dis.”

Or are saying big ears is all hunky dory with the illegitimate son?


69 posted on 09/18/2025 3:38:38 PM PDT by Skwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Skwor

He did not have his titles removed. What was removed was that they were not to be addressed as “Their royal highnesses” in their commercial ventures. But they are still the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and he is still a Prince in the line of succession to the throne.

You can’t just say stuff and hope it’s right.

And no, I’m saying Harry is not illegitimate, and if there were any doubt, the Royal Family would have DNA tested him long, long ago.


70 posted on 09/18/2025 7:00:24 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (RIP, Charlie. Say hi to Andrew Breitbart. God protect your family. Justice for Charlie Kirk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

If he can’t used a title a title was removed. You just want to argue semantics and avoid admitting Charles is not happy with Harry, which is the point. The illegitimate thing is possible which still is a lingering scandal, neither you nor I know the acvtual truth of that.

So ya don’t care that you want to make the issue about a detail that is not relevant to the event. Yes whatever you clarified is true, still does not change they have a title they cannot use AND Charles is not happy with Harry.

SO argue the other stuff all you want, I do not care.

Now back to the event, was Charles happy or not with Harry and was Trump rude. Stop avoiding what was the issue.


71 posted on 09/18/2025 7:23:02 PM PDT by Skwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Skwor

You posted a lot of unfounded garbage about real people who have great responsibiities as the head diplomats for the 147 nations in the British Commonwealth and great influence as the U.S.’s chief partner regarding the survival of Western Civ. You sneered about them like a common gossip as if they hang out at the local biker bar and you’ve known them since middle school. Now you’re not happy because I called you on it.


72 posted on 09/18/2025 8:13:04 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (RIP, Charlie. Say hi to Andrew Breitbart. God protect your family. Justice for Charlie Kirk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Skwor
If he can’t used a title a title was removed.

And no, that is not a title. "Highness" is a form of address, not a title.

73 posted on 09/18/2025 8:14:27 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (RIP, Charlie. Say hi to Andrew Breitbart. God protect your family. Justice for Charlie Kirk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

Ohh, please Harry has no responsibilities to the government. His brother, william may and charles currently does.

Stop with the self righteousness, your bio embarrasses you, if you’re going to go that way, I was inaccurate. I am guilty of that, but the rest of the stuff is you throwing around baseless accusations.

And this is like, your third post, will refuse?The answer to the simple question is king charles happy with his son, harry.Why do you not answer that?That was the whole issue I raised.


74 posted on 09/18/2025 8:15:24 PM PDT by Skwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Skwor

That was never the question and you know it. I hope you are not married. I pity your spouse. Take a chill pill.


75 posted on 09/18/2025 8:16:38 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (RIP, Charlie. Say hi to Andrew Breitbart. God protect your family. Justice for Charlie Kirk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Skwor

Since he only gave him 20 or so minutes the other day,I’d say he’s not. However he does seem to let Harry flit around cosplaying a Royal on a tour, plus doesn’t stop them using titles/HRH inappropriately so idk. I believe they’re also still on the Royal family website?


76 posted on 09/18/2025 8:20:40 PM PDT by pnz1 ("These people have gone stone-cold crazy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

Since you wanna be so proper in detail oriented, maybe you should learn to read a dictionary.Here is one of the definitions of a title of which fits the way I was using it.

3
: a descriptive name : appellation
4
a
: an appellation of dignity, honor, distinction, or preeminence attached to a person or family by virtue of rank, office, precedent, privilege, attainment, or lands
b
: a person holding a title especially of nobility


77 posted on 09/18/2025 8:21:16 PM PDT by Skwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

Why are you lying, I literally asked that question several times specifically in reference to my first post, making the point that Trump not mentioning Harry may have been respectful. You are literally lying about my posts. How can your bio quote scripture when you so easily lie about others,

I asked you that question several times, is Charles happy with Harry, now you say I never asked it?! People can easily scan back on the psots and see you are denying reality now.


78 posted on 09/18/2025 8:32:48 PM PDT by Skwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson