Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does the First Amendment Protect Threats and Hate Speech?
FindLaw ^ | August 21,2024 | Balrina Ahluwalia, Esq.

Posted on 09/16/2025 5:20:06 PM PDT by DoodleBob

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 09/16/2025 5:20:06 PM PDT by DoodleBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

WTF is hate speech?


2 posted on 09/16/2025 5:27:09 PM PDT by HYPOCRACY (Wake up, smell the cat food in your bank account. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

Good article. Thanks for posting.


3 posted on 09/16/2025 5:30:53 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Right_In_Virginia’s 84% Plausibly Anti-Semitic posts put him at #1! Any challengers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

The Courts have ruled that the Constitution does not apply to your personal space. You are allowed to have whatever unconstitutional rules you want within your space.


4 posted on 09/16/2025 5:34:34 PM PDT by Jonty30 (Pornography feeds abortion. Abortion is Satan's ultimate effort to hurt God. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

Unfortunately hate speech legal, serious threats of harm or death are ALREADY illegal...


5 posted on 09/16/2025 5:35:12 PM PDT by Openurmind (AI - An Illusion for Aptitude Intrusion to Alter Intellect. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HYPOCRACY

π˜žπ˜›π˜ π˜ͺ𝘴 𝘩𝘒𝘡𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘦𝘀𝘩?

𝘏𝘒𝘡𝘦 𝘚𝘱𝘦𝘦𝘀𝘩 is to the First Amendment what 𝘈𝘴𝘴𝘒𝘢𝘭𝘡 𝘞𝘦𝘒𝘱𝘰𝘯 is to the Second Amendment. A nebulous political term that can used to fit political narratives and allow politicians to erode civil liberties.


6 posted on 09/16/2025 5:37:32 PM PDT by Antihero101607
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

What’s the definition of “your personnel space”?


7 posted on 09/16/2025 5:40:27 PM PDT by KrisKrinkle (c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob
The 8-0 1964 New York Times Co. v Sullivan decision was disgraceful.
8 posted on 09/16/2025 5:42:35 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KrisKrinkle

As the courts ruled, your home and business.


9 posted on 09/16/2025 5:42:47 PM PDT by Jonty30 (Pornography feeds abortion. Abortion is Satan's ultimate effort to hurt God. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

I’ve always heard it expressed as the right to wave your fist around ends at the tip of my nose.

CC


10 posted on 09/16/2025 5:44:18 PM PDT by Celtic Conservative (*This is a test of the emergency tagline system. This is only a test*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HYPOCRACY

Glenn Beck said when the government decides the “truth” and “hate speech” definitions then the people are doomed to tyranny.

Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter long ago said: The most difficult right for a person to tolerate is to allow freedom for the thought we hate.

We, of course, have had to grit our teeth, clench our fists, and tolerate a nerdy guy who urinates on a portrait of Jesus or one who does that to an American flag. “Protected speech” the SCOTUS rules.


11 posted on 09/16/2025 5:44:25 PM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

Free speech, including β€œhate” speech, has absolute protection when you’re referring to disfavored groups (e.g., straight white males, Jews, etc.). However, when you’re referring to sanctified groups (e.g., Blacks), no derogatory speech is permitted.


12 posted on 09/16/2025 5:44:30 PM PDT by RAldrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

Inciting violence. For example, the sort of language that leads directly to an act of vigilantism. After all, a lone assassin is basically a lynch party of one.
If you whip up a crowd to lynch someone, is that not a crime?

If so, it doesn’t depend on the length of time, as much as on how direct the line between the speech and the action (whether intended, or even unintended — as in “negligent” homicide).


13 posted on 09/16/2025 5:46:53 PM PDT by Buttons12 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

What’s to stop anyone from yelling “FIRE!” in a crowded theater?


14 posted on 09/16/2025 5:53:38 PM PDT by gdzla (Tyrannis Seditio, Obsequium Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gdzla

Property rights.

The theater owner can throw the yeller out. It’s the owner’s property. His rules win.


15 posted on 09/16/2025 5:56:12 PM PDT by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/sΒ²)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

I’ve spent my entire life listening to people that hate me.
They have the right to say what they want,
I should have the same right to speak about them.
As far as Federal law is concerned I can say “Nigger”
and White trash, or “Whitey”.
Local communities have different rules.
Freedom of speech means exactly that!
I can call a Moslem a Godless POS
They can call me an infidel.
Our Constitution allows us to speak
openly and share our views.
Regardless of how we may object to those views.


16 posted on 09/16/2025 5:56:24 PM PDT by rellic (No such thing as a moderate Moslem or Democrat )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

Thanks ChatGPT, I’m guessing.


17 posted on 09/16/2025 5:57:18 PM PDT by pingman ("Step right up! Get your free helicopter ride, courtesy of Pinochet Air!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Openurmind

I don’t think it’s unfortunate that hate speech is legal. If it were illegal, every criticism of everything would be considered “hate speech” Direct threats of serious harm, of course, have been illegal for a long time.


18 posted on 09/16/2025 6:00:30 PM PDT by Quickgun (I got here kicking,screaming and covered in someone else's blood. I can go out that way if I have to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

Hate speech yes, threats no!


19 posted on 09/16/2025 6:02:08 PM PDT by Harpotoo (Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quickgun

The FR has spit it’s own share out. Even to each other here...


20 posted on 09/16/2025 6:05:39 PM PDT by Openurmind (AI - An Illusion for Aptitude Intrusion to Alter Intellect. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson