Really.
Let me politely recommend you think it through. "Hate speech" can be defined very broadly in today's usage.
Bondi is cracking down on hate speech that she has specifically defined as violating established federal statutes - there is no evidence she will waste her time/money on mere ugly words.
Then why not just reference the wording in those federal statues against death threats and incitement to violence? Things for which there is a legal definition. Maybe she just aint kno words or statootes too good. T'aint no evidins that she nose the diffrinse.
There is a distinct difference between hate speech and threatening speech. Hearing an AG talk about a crackdown on hate speech does not give me comfort.