Charlie Kirk’s Death Exposed the Biggest Scam in History

Chase Hughes ^ | 12/9/25 | Chase Hughes

[Eleutheria5]

Charlie Kirk’s assassination will dominate the headlines—but before the truth is even clear, the disinformation machine is already spinning. This video exposes how suppression, radicalization, and division are weaponized—not by ideology, but by systems designed to keep you outraged, divided, and distracted.

We’ll reveal:
• Why suppression is the biggest red flag in history—and why it always signals weakness, not strength.
• How highly suggestible people are radicalized—not by one side or the other, but through media outrage loops, algorithmic echo chambers, and deliberate manipulation.
• The illusion of “left vs. right”—a distraction designed to pit neighbors against each other while corruption, corporate power, and elites escape untouched.
• The common ground we all share: freedom, safety, stability, fairness—and what none of us want: corruption, endless wars for profit, elites with different rules, surveillance states, and justice systems that bend for the powerful but break for the rest of us.

This is not a partisan message.
Suppression is weakness.
Radicalization is manipulation.
Disinformation is the bait.
And if you don’t understand how this machinery works, you’ll keep falling for it.

• Charlie Kirk assassination 2025
• Charlie Kirk shooting Utah Valley
• disinformation after tragedy
• suppression of ideas history Galileo MLK Cold War
• media outrage manipulation
• social media echo chambers radicalization
• left vs right illusion politics
• corruption in politics elites
• disinformation suppression radicalization
• how to spot fake news
.....
God bless the Kirk family.

Transcript linked below video.

[MinorityRepublican]

It’s still totally legal in the states that want it to be legal.

Eventually, there were other issues that were more important such as the economy in 2024.

But in 2022, but we know that the Democrats are very good at manipulation, after all it is what they do all the time. They were able to frame it as that the Republicans took away the right to choose. And they were able to motivate their voters to show up.

So Roe vs Wade was a huge issue and that was why we didn't have a "Red Wave" in 2022.

[Eleutheria5]

If I had wheels, I’d be a streetcar.

We are now several years past the overturn of Roe, and a states’ rights regimen has replaced it. States now have a right to choose, and the legislatures of those states are answerable to women voters as well.

Even a Dem POTUS cannot be certain to get a SCOTUS who will overturn the overturn, and reinstate Roe, which was a bad decision regardless of whether or not you’re pro-choice. It was badly written law about a critical issue, who is and is not human, which is a question SCOTUS flubbed back in the 1800s, too, ruling that blacks are not human so can be enslaved and returned to their masters even from a free state to which they fled. That ended well/sarc Abortion is no longer a major issue, even with women. Murder and mayhem in the streets and illegal immigration...ah...Trumped it.

[Eleutheria5]

Tomatoes, tomahtoes. It’s now established law that it’s up to the states.

What was huge in 22 is now minor. They can’t manipulate people into voting their way on account of Roe anymore.

[MinorityRepublican]

Even a Dem POTUS cannot be certain to get a SCOTUS who will overturn the overturn, and reinstate Roe, which was a bad decision regardless of whether or not you’re pro-choice.

A lot of it depends on who will be POTUS in the near future. Then he gets to select new Justices for the SCOTUS. If there is a Democratic majority on the SCOTUS, they will just have a repeat of the original Roe vs Wade ruling.

[Segovia]

I will agree with you on this; 2022 can be lain right at the feet of Ms. Romney.

[Eleutheria5]

Also the turtle, who was too preoccupied with keeping his best pal Murkowski in office to help out any challengers. Ms. Romney should not be trusted anywhere near political campaigns.

[Eleutheria5]

Only if they have open seats to fill. I don’t think they will, unless they are serious about going full “night and fog” on the justices presently seated. In the natural course of longevity, Thomas is the only one I worry about. Alito would be no loss, and Brave Sir Roberts is unreliable anyway. The rest are in their primes. Thomas, however, is getting on in years, and he’s irreplaceable.