Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This will go nowhere.
We already have court decisions that ruled
lawyers have “free speech” to advertise.


4 posted on 09/10/2025 7:33:33 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (Get out of the matrix and get a real life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Repeal The 17th
The United States and New Zealand are the only two countries that allow direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertisements.

With TV Drug Ads, What You See Is Not Necessarily What You Get

6 posted on 09/10/2025 7:41:50 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Democrats are the Party of racism, anger, hate and violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Repeal The 17th

They can say it is perfectly legal for drug companies to speak, but it is illegal for the TV networks to sell them add time. The TV networks are not engaged in speech when they sell time to advertisers, and they remain free themselves to say whatever they want to say.


9 posted on 09/10/2025 8:19:52 PM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson