The After works too.
Posted on 09/10/2025 10:42:26 AM PDT by nickcarraway
HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has taken the decision to remove a new Banksy mural due to the building being listed and therefore legally protected. However, some feel that they are “silencing a work of art about silencing protest”...
A new Banksy artwork that sprung up this week at the Royal Courts of Justice in London has been scrubbed off.
As we reported this week, the mural by the ever-elusive street artist depicted a helpless protester lying on the ground holding a blood-spattered placard, while a judge loomed over him wielding a gavel.
British police moved quickly to cover-up a mural, with HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) taking the decision to remove it due to the Victorian gothic revival style building being 143 years old and listed - therefore legally protected.
Good Law Project posted on X about the artwork's removal: "The court is erasing Banksy's mural just like it's erasing our right to protest. It only took 48 hours for the Royal Courts of Justice to scrub out a Banksy showing a judge striking down a protester with his gavel.”
The post added: “Silencing a work of art about silencing protest? Maybe it was a little too close to home."
Banksy confirmed he was responsible for the work with a post on Instagram, showing the graffiti before it was covered over.
The artwork comes after almost 900 demonstrators were arrested for protesting in central London on Saturday against the banning of Palestine Action as a terror group.
The group was proscribed by the UK government under anti-terror laws earlier this year - making support for the direct action group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
Recently, Downing Street warned best-selling Irish author Sally Rooney that her public pledge to support the banned group Palestine Action could fall foul of terrorism laws.
Is it just me, or does the judge look Arabic?
The UK government believes in freedom of speech and will ruthlessly crush anyone who says otherwise.
censoring a picture of the government engaging in censorship
that’s where they are....actually read an article which said that free speech isn’t dead, but common sense is (meaning, you can’t say stuff that is wrong because that’s not free speech...wrong is of course “right wing”)
If someone spraypainted "Obama is the best" on your house in giant letters, would you take it down? They have every right to say "Obama is the best," just not on your house.
A Banksy grafitti of a white judge beating a protesting minority in London.
*Yawn* As if.
Now, if another street artist had immediately followed up with making the wig a ghutra, the placard a cross of St. George, and the beaten man a more identifiable Briton, that would have created a real uproar on at least two different levels!
The After works too.
Paint a mural on your own house.
Hah! You get the gold star for today, my FRiend
Oh the judge looks Arabic all right, hook-nosed and bearded, and his wig a burnoose.
Apparently I mean ghutra not burnoose. Distinctions.
It’s sad this post didn’t get more attention today, but it was overshadowed by the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
Banksy does good work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.