Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Okay everyone I want to say this, I was a Home Economic major, I did very well in clothing and textiles. With that said, yes I see the problem with this garment.

It's a classic case of it looks better on the model or the hanger than it does on an actual woman's body.

In fact this one of the worse cases I've ever seen.

I suspect women who actually want to try to wear this might want to go up in a size and see if that helps, other wise a woman has to have a body type like twiggy to wear it.

My honest opinion.

1 posted on 09/04/2025 12:49:32 PM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: Morgana

Anyone named Dr. Crouch would have to be an expert on this.


2 posted on 09/04/2025 12:51:29 PM PDT by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

You mean artificial labia should not magically appear on women’s slacks?


3 posted on 09/04/2025 12:53:31 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Ok. Yeah. I can see the camel toe effect.


4 posted on 09/04/2025 12:56:23 PM PDT by Tench_Coxe (The woke were surprised by the reaction to the Bud Light fiasco. May there be many more surprises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana
After being forced to view morbidly obese women wearing lululemon skin tight yoga pants, I fully support Target's current direction in fashion sense.

I'm flat out of eye wash.

6 posted on 09/04/2025 1:01:01 PM PDT by rdcbn1 (..when poets buy guns, tourist season is over................Walter R. Mead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

It’s Target. Chances are they’re designed for non-female women of the masculine persuasion and not, you know, actual women.


7 posted on 09/04/2025 1:01:23 PM PDT by Retrofitted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

I’m an old woman. Wore pleated skirts and hip-pleated skirts in the 60’s, so I find nothing wrong with the design. I wouldn’t want bell-bottom pants however. Wore enough of those in the 60’s too. With the extra pleated space and the bell-bottoms, they look like something Moochie Obama would wear, to give his big, black ass more space to fit in, and more area to hide his Crown Jewels.


8 posted on 09/04/2025 1:01:37 PM PDT by mass55th (“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana
Come on, people. Those are clearlyGothic Arches. Very classical pants from the Middle Ages.


10 posted on 09/04/2025 1:02:57 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

It’s a ridiculous design choice. I don’t know if it was intentional but someone should have noticed it to go to market. Someone signed off on it, multiple people likely including the buyers at the retailer. Someone perhaps *wanted* that look. It’s different. I presume it’s not been done before and *maybe* there is a market for people who actually like that idea/look.

Personally I find it tasteless and unappealing.


12 posted on 09/04/2025 1:06:09 PM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

What does this have to do with Health?


14 posted on 09/04/2025 1:06:42 PM PDT by Paladin2 (YMMV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Target specializes in UGLY. Not surprised by this one.


17 posted on 09/04/2025 1:07:23 PM PDT by tcox4575
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Funny, I looked at it and thought “wow that lady to too fat to wear pleated pants she should know better”.


19 posted on 09/04/2025 1:09:51 PM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (Orange is the new brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

20 posted on 09/04/2025 1:10:58 PM PDT by OldHarbor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

I suspect it may simply be a case of the people who designed it not being shaped the same as their customers. I’m perfectly serious - it’s tough enough for a Western man to purchase clothing in Asia (believe me, I know), especially trousers (you look like you’re about to go wading in high water). For women it’s a real challenge.


21 posted on 09/04/2025 1:11:26 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Dr. Crotch has a dirty mind...................


24 posted on 09/04/2025 1:17:09 PM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Nasty pants. That one looks nothing like the one pictured to try and say others are like it.
Dr Crotch has nasty pants. A pleat is not needed there. 😆

That is like making an open hole, no zipper, in the crotch of men’s pants.


25 posted on 09/04/2025 1:18:11 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

if unflattering clothing was a health issue, most of us would already be at death’s doorstep ...


26 posted on 09/04/2025 1:21:14 PM PDT by catnipman ((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana
I've always thought fashion designers were always a little off. I made the mistake of going to look. Why would such a designer design simple pants and think everyone wants to look at camel-toes so often? I'm no prude and love the shape of women, but this obscene look is beyond the pale.

There is a reason most American women prefer men in "board shorts" rather than "speedos".

27 posted on 09/04/2025 1:26:55 PM PDT by A Navy Vet (USA Birth Certificate - 1789. Death Certificate - 2021? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Looks butt ugly to boot.


28 posted on 09/04/2025 1:26:59 PM PDT by packrat35 (Pureblood! No clot shot for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

I think that the problem is just that she is trying to squeeze into pants that are 17 sizes too small for her. The seams are all stretched, distorting the look. I think that the largest size available is only XXXXXL. She needs to see Omar, the Tent Maker for her wardrobe needs.


32 posted on 09/04/2025 1:49:30 PM PDT by Colorado Doug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Worst fashion I’ve seen since high leg swimwear. (Try finding one that isn’t.) IMO the swimwear is worse.
It wouldn’t have made a bad skirt, though.


34 posted on 09/04/2025 1:57:48 PM PDT by Buttons12 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson